The development of accurate and realistic models of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) antennas is being driven by research into quantitative amplitude information from GPR, improved GPR antenna designs, and better-performing forward simulations that can feed into inversion algorithms. The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method and Finite-Integration technique (FIT) are popular numerical methods for simulating electromagnetic wave propagation. Time-Domain methods are particularly well-suited to modelling ultra-wideband GPR antennas as a broad range of frequencies can be modelled with a single simulation. We present comparisons using experimental and simulated data from a Geophysical Survey Systems 1.5 GHz antenna and a MALÅ Geoscience 1.2 GHz antenna. The antennas were investigated in free space and over a lossy dielectric environment with a target. For the simulations we used a commercial solver - Computer Simulation Technology Microwave Studio (CST) - and a free open-source FDTD solver - gprMax. For each test scenario, phase and amplitude information from the antenna responses were compared. Generally, we found very good agreement between the experimental data and the two simulations.

An evaluation of finite-difference and finite-integration time-domain modelling tools for Ground Penetrating Radar antennas / Warren, Craig; Pajewski, Lara; Ventura, Alessio; Giannopoulos, Antonios. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 1-5. (Intervento presentato al convegno 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2016 tenutosi a Davos, Svizzera nel 10-15 aprile 2016) [10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7482010].

An evaluation of finite-difference and finite-integration time-domain modelling tools for Ground Penetrating Radar antennas

Pajewski, Lara
;
2016

Abstract

The development of accurate and realistic models of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) antennas is being driven by research into quantitative amplitude information from GPR, improved GPR antenna designs, and better-performing forward simulations that can feed into inversion algorithms. The Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) method and Finite-Integration technique (FIT) are popular numerical methods for simulating electromagnetic wave propagation. Time-Domain methods are particularly well-suited to modelling ultra-wideband GPR antennas as a broad range of frequencies can be modelled with a single simulation. We present comparisons using experimental and simulated data from a Geophysical Survey Systems 1.5 GHz antenna and a MALÅ Geoscience 1.2 GHz antenna. The antennas were investigated in free space and over a lossy dielectric environment with a target. For the simulations we used a commercial solver - Computer Simulation Technology Microwave Studio (CST) - and a free open-source FDTD solver - gprMax. For each test scenario, phase and amplitude information from the antenna responses were compared. Generally, we found very good agreement between the experimental data and the two simulations.
2016
10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2016
antenna; finite-difference time-domain; Ground Penetrating Radar; simulation
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
An evaluation of finite-difference and finite-integration time-domain modelling tools for Ground Penetrating Radar antennas / Warren, Craig; Pajewski, Lara; Ventura, Alessio; Giannopoulos, Antonios. - STAMPA. - (2016), pp. 1-5. (Intervento presentato al convegno 10th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, EuCAP 2016 tenutosi a Davos, Svizzera nel 10-15 aprile 2016) [10.1109/EuCAP.2016.7482010].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Warren_Evaluation_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.69 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.69 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1097313
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact