The Internet of Things (IoT) revolution promises to make our lives easier by providing cheap and always connected smart embedded devices, which can interact on the Internet and create added values for human needs. But all that glitters is not gold. Indeed, the other side of the coin is that, from a security perspective, this IoT revolution represents a potential disaster. This plethora of IoT devices that flooded the market were very badly protected, thus an easy prey for several families of malwares that can enslave and incorporate them in very large botnets. This, eventually, brought back to the top Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, making them more powerful and easier to achieve than ever. This paper aims at provide an up-to-date picture of DDoS attacks in the specific subject of the IoT, studying how these attacks work and considering the most common families in the IoT context, in terms of their nature and evolution through the years. It also explores the additional offensive capabilities that this arsenal of IoT malwares has available, to mine the security of Internet users and systems. We think that this up-to-date picture will be a valuable reference to the scientific community in order to take a first crucial step to tackle this urgent security issue. © 2017 PTI.

Analysis of DDoS-capable IoT malwares / De Donno, Michele; Dragoni, Nicola; Giaretta, Alberto; Spognardi, Angelo. - 11:(2017), pp. 807-816. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017 tenutosi a Prague; Czech Republic nel 2017) [10.15439/2017F288].

Analysis of DDoS-capable IoT malwares

Spognardi, Angelo
2017

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) revolution promises to make our lives easier by providing cheap and always connected smart embedded devices, which can interact on the Internet and create added values for human needs. But all that glitters is not gold. Indeed, the other side of the coin is that, from a security perspective, this IoT revolution represents a potential disaster. This plethora of IoT devices that flooded the market were very badly protected, thus an easy prey for several families of malwares that can enslave and incorporate them in very large botnets. This, eventually, brought back to the top Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks, making them more powerful and easier to achieve than ever. This paper aims at provide an up-to-date picture of DDoS attacks in the specific subject of the IoT, studying how these attacks work and considering the most common families in the IoT context, in terms of their nature and evolution through the years. It also explores the additional offensive capabilities that this arsenal of IoT malwares has available, to mine the security of Internet users and systems. We think that this up-to-date picture will be a valuable reference to the scientific community in order to take a first crucial step to tackle this urgent security issue. © 2017 PTI.
2017
2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017
computer science (miscellaneous); information systems
04 Pubblicazione in atti di convegno::04b Atto di convegno in volume
Analysis of DDoS-capable IoT malwares / De Donno, Michele; Dragoni, Nicola; Giaretta, Alberto; Spognardi, Angelo. - 11:(2017), pp. 807-816. (Intervento presentato al convegno 2017 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, FedCSIS 2017 tenutosi a Prague; Czech Republic nel 2017) [10.15439/2017F288].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
De-Donno_Analysis_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 624.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
624.57 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1094079
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 67
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 39
social impact