Globally, the number of hip fractures is expected to double between 2017 and 2050, from ~2.2 million to ~4.5 million. For the purposes of analgesia and remobilisation, ~ 99% of hip fractures should be fixed surgically, requiring anaesthesia. Surgery for hip fracture has become increasingly standardised, but peri‐operative medical and anaesthetic care varies considerably. Peri‐operative morbidity and mortality remain high. Guidelines exist for the anaesthetic management of patients with hip fracture, but are specific to the healthcare systems of Western nations. This consensus statement (advises basic standards of anaesthetic care that hip fracture patients should expect to receive in any country, regardless of resources. On behalf of the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN), the Anaesthesia Working Group (SW) invited internationally recognised experts in hip fracture anaesthesia and national professional leaders to contribute to a Consensus Com-mittee.

International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture / White, S. M.; Altermatt, F.; Barry, J.; Ben-David, B.; Coburn, M.; Coluzzi, F.; Degoli, M.; Dillane, D.; Foss, N. B.; Gelmanas, A.; Griffiths, R.; Karpetas, G.; Kim, J. -H.; Kluger, M.; Lau, P. -W.; Matot, I.; Mcbrien, M.; Mcmanus, S.; Montoya-Pelaez, L. F.; Moppett, I. K.; Parker, M.; Porrill, O.; Sanders, R. D.; Shelton, C.; Sieber, F.; Trikha, A.; Xuebing, X.. - In: ANAESTHESIA. - ISSN 0003-2409. - STAMPA. - 73:7(2018), pp. 863-874. [10.1111/anae.14225]

International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture

Coluzzi, F.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2018

Abstract

Globally, the number of hip fractures is expected to double between 2017 and 2050, from ~2.2 million to ~4.5 million. For the purposes of analgesia and remobilisation, ~ 99% of hip fractures should be fixed surgically, requiring anaesthesia. Surgery for hip fracture has become increasingly standardised, but peri‐operative medical and anaesthetic care varies considerably. Peri‐operative morbidity and mortality remain high. Guidelines exist for the anaesthetic management of patients with hip fracture, but are specific to the healthcare systems of Western nations. This consensus statement (advises basic standards of anaesthetic care that hip fracture patients should expect to receive in any country, regardless of resources. On behalf of the Fragility Fracture Network (FFN), the Anaesthesia Working Group (SW) invited internationally recognised experts in hip fracture anaesthesia and national professional leaders to contribute to a Consensus Com-mittee.
2018
anaesthesia; consensus guidelines; hip fracture; hip fracture management; anesthesiology and pain medicine
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
International Fragility Fracture Network Delphi consensus statement on the principles of anaesthesia for patients with hip fracture / White, S. M.; Altermatt, F.; Barry, J.; Ben-David, B.; Coburn, M.; Coluzzi, F.; Degoli, M.; Dillane, D.; Foss, N. B.; Gelmanas, A.; Griffiths, R.; Karpetas, G.; Kim, J. -H.; Kluger, M.; Lau, P. -W.; Matot, I.; Mcbrien, M.; Mcmanus, S.; Montoya-Pelaez, L. F.; Moppett, I. K.; Parker, M.; Porrill, O.; Sanders, R. D.; Shelton, C.; Sieber, F.; Trikha, A.; Xuebing, X.. - In: ANAESTHESIA. - ISSN 0003-2409. - STAMPA. - 73:7(2018), pp. 863-874. [10.1111/anae.14225]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
White_International-fragilit-fracture_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 140.29 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
140.29 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1090651
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 16
  • Scopus 66
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 52
social impact