Reducing firm environmental burden is not easy. Thus, several studies have investigated the antecedents of good firm environmental performance; however, they provide contrasting results, focus on specific categories of antecedents, and often rely on subjective performance measures. This study overcomes these gaps by jointly considering the effects of different firm strategic and organizational orientations on several dimensions of environmental performance, objectively measured. Through the analysis of 269 large global companies included in the Newsweek Green Ranking 20141, we found that: both market and environmental management orientations have a positive effect on carbon, energy, and water productivity; green supply chain management orientation has a positive influence on waste and water productivity; and technology orientation negatively affects carbon and waste productivity. Based on these findings, we advise managers that strategic and organizational orientations do not affect all types of environmental performance in the same way, thus calling for caution when they are designed for environmentally friendly purposes.

Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organizational orientations / Ardito, Lorenzo; Dangelico, Rosa Maria. - In: CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 1535-3958. - STAMPA. - 25:4(2018), pp. 426-440. [10.1002/csr.1470]

Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organizational orientations

Dangelico, Rosa Maria
2018

Abstract

Reducing firm environmental burden is not easy. Thus, several studies have investigated the antecedents of good firm environmental performance; however, they provide contrasting results, focus on specific categories of antecedents, and often rely on subjective performance measures. This study overcomes these gaps by jointly considering the effects of different firm strategic and organizational orientations on several dimensions of environmental performance, objectively measured. Through the analysis of 269 large global companies included in the Newsweek Green Ranking 20141, we found that: both market and environmental management orientations have a positive effect on carbon, energy, and water productivity; green supply chain management orientation has a positive influence on waste and water productivity; and technology orientation negatively affects carbon and waste productivity. Based on these findings, we advise managers that strategic and organizational orientations do not affect all types of environmental performance in the same way, thus calling for caution when they are designed for environmentally friendly purposes.
2018
environmental performance; market orientation; technology orientation; environmental management orientation; green supply chain management orientation; sustainable development
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organizational orientations / Ardito, Lorenzo; Dangelico, Rosa Maria. - In: CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY & ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 1535-3958. - STAMPA. - 25:4(2018), pp. 426-440. [10.1002/csr.1470]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Ardito_Firm-environmental-performance_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 231.88 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
231.88 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Ardito_preprint_Firm-environmental-performance_2018.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/csr.1470
Tipologia: Documento in Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore, precedente alla peer review)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 436.84 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
436.84 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1089595
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 124
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 109
social impact