BACKGROUND: Controversies exist whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is superior to miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in reducing deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass as only a number of smaller randomized controlled trials (RCT) currently provide a limited evidence base. The main purpose of conducting the present meta-analysis was to overcome the expected low power in RCTs in an attempt to establish whether MECC is comparable to OPCAB. METHODS: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to identify eligible RCTs. A pooled summary effect estimate was calculated by means of Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: The search yielded 7 RCTs included in this meta-analysis enrolling 271 patients in the OPCAB group and 279 in the MECC group. The OPCAB and MECC groups were comparable in terms of incidence of in-hospital mortality (Risk Difference [RD] 0.01; 95%CI -0.02, 0.03; P = 0.55; I(2) = 0%), stroke (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.05, 0.04; P = 0.69; I(2) = 0%), need for renal replacement therapy (RD 0.00; -0.06, 0.06; P = 1; I(2) = 0%), postoperative atrial fibrillation (RD -0.03; -0.17, 0.10; P = 0.64; I(2) = 0%), re-exploration for bleeding (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.03, 0.02; P = 0.65; I(2) = 0%), transfusion rate (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.03, 0.02; P = 0.65; I(2) = 0%) and the amount of blood loss (weighted mean difference -25 mL; 95%CI -71, 21; P = 0.28; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Using a meta-analytic approach, MECC achieves clinical results comparable to OPCAB including postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirement. On the basis of our findings, MECC should be considered as a valid alternative to OPCAB in order to reduce surgical morbidity of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.

Miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / Benedetto, Umberto; Ng, Colin; Frati, Giacomo; Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe; Vitulli, Piergiusto; Zeinah, Mohamed; Raja, Shahzad G.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1743-9191. - 14:(2015), pp. 96-104. [10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.021]

Miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Benedetto, Umberto;Frati, Giacomo;Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe;
2015

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Controversies exist whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) is superior to miniaturized extracorporeal circulation (MECC) in reducing deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass as only a number of smaller randomized controlled trials (RCT) currently provide a limited evidence base. The main purpose of conducting the present meta-analysis was to overcome the expected low power in RCTs in an attempt to establish whether MECC is comparable to OPCAB. METHODS: A MEDLINE/PubMed search was conducted to identify eligible RCTs. A pooled summary effect estimate was calculated by means of Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: The search yielded 7 RCTs included in this meta-analysis enrolling 271 patients in the OPCAB group and 279 in the MECC group. The OPCAB and MECC groups were comparable in terms of incidence of in-hospital mortality (Risk Difference [RD] 0.01; 95%CI -0.02, 0.03; P = 0.55; I(2) = 0%), stroke (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.05, 0.04; P = 0.69; I(2) = 0%), need for renal replacement therapy (RD 0.00; -0.06, 0.06; P = 1; I(2) = 0%), postoperative atrial fibrillation (RD -0.03; -0.17, 0.10; P = 0.64; I(2) = 0%), re-exploration for bleeding (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.03, 0.02; P = 0.65; I(2) = 0%), transfusion rate (RD -0.01; 95%CI -0.03, 0.02; P = 0.65; I(2) = 0%) and the amount of blood loss (weighted mean difference -25 mL; 95%CI -71, 21; P = 0.28; I(2) = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Using a meta-analytic approach, MECC achieves clinical results comparable to OPCAB including postoperative blood loss and blood transfusion requirement. On the basis of our findings, MECC should be considered as a valid alternative to OPCAB in order to reduce surgical morbidity of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass.
2015
meta-analysis; minimized extracorporeal circulation; off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; blood transfusion; cardiopulmonary bypass; extracorporeal circulation; hospital mortality; humans; incidence; miniaturization; postoperative hemorrhage; randomized controlled trials as topic; coronary artery bypass, off-pump; surgery
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Miniaturized extracorporeal circulation versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / Benedetto, Umberto; Ng, Colin; Frati, Giacomo; Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe; Vitulli, Piergiusto; Zeinah, Mohamed; Raja, Shahzad G.. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY. - ISSN 1743-9191. - 14:(2015), pp. 96-104. [10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.12.021]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Benedetto_Miniaturized-extracorporeal-circulation_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 2.65 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.65 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1080174
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact