Intensive glycemic control (IGC) targeting HbA1c fails to show an unequivocal reduction of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Epigenetic changes are emerging as important mediators of cardiovascular damage and may play a role in this setting. This study investigated whether epigenetic regulation of the adaptor protein p66Shc, a key driver of mitochondrial oxidative stress, contributes to persistent vascular dysfunction in patients with T2D despite IGC. Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c >7.5%) and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were consecutively enrolled. IGC was implemented for 6 months in patients with T2D to achieve a target HbA1c of ≤7.0%. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), urinary 8-isoprostaglandin F2α (8-isoPGF2α), and epigenetic regulation of p66Shc were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed to determine the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) and postprandial incremental area under the curve (AUCpp). At baseline, patients with T2D showed impaired FMD, increased urinary 8-isoPGF2α, and p66Shc upregulation in circulating monocytes compared with control subjects. FMD, 8-isoPGF2α, and p66Shc expression were not affected by IGC. DNA hypomethylation and histone 3 acetylation were found on the p66Shc promoter of patients with T2D, and IGC did not change such adverse epigenetic remodeling. Persistent downregulation of methyltransferase DNMT3b and deacetylase SIRT1 may explain the observed p66Shc-related epigenetic changes. MAGE and AUCpp but not HbA1c were independently associated with the altered epigenetic profile on the p66Shc promoter. Hence, glucose fluctuations contribute to chromatin remodeling and may explain persistent vascular dysfunction in patients with T2D with target HbA1c levels.

Impact of glycemic variability on chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and with target HbA1c levels / Costantino, Sarah; Paneni, Francesco; Battista, Rodolfo; Castello, Lorenzo; Capretti, Giuliana; Chiandotto, Sergio; Tanese, Luigi; Russo, Giulio; Pitocco, Dario; Lanza, Gaetano A.; Volpe, Massimo; Lüscher, Thomas F.; Cosentino, Francesco. - In: DIABETES. - ISSN 0012-1797. - STAMPA. - 66:9(2017), pp. 2472-2482. [10.2337/db17-0294]

Impact of glycemic variability on chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and with target HbA1c levels

Paneni, Francesco;Castello, Lorenzo;Capretti, Giuliana;Chiandotto, Sergio;Volpe, Massimo;Cosentino, Francesco
2017

Abstract

Intensive glycemic control (IGC) targeting HbA1c fails to show an unequivocal reduction of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D); however, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Epigenetic changes are emerging as important mediators of cardiovascular damage and may play a role in this setting. This study investigated whether epigenetic regulation of the adaptor protein p66Shc, a key driver of mitochondrial oxidative stress, contributes to persistent vascular dysfunction in patients with T2D despite IGC. Thirty-nine patients with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c >7.5%) and 24 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were consecutively enrolled. IGC was implemented for 6 months in patients with T2D to achieve a target HbA1c of ≤7.0%. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), urinary 8-isoprostaglandin F2α (8-isoPGF2α), and epigenetic regulation of p66Shc were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Continuous glucose monitoring was performed to determine the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) and postprandial incremental area under the curve (AUCpp). At baseline, patients with T2D showed impaired FMD, increased urinary 8-isoPGF2α, and p66Shc upregulation in circulating monocytes compared with control subjects. FMD, 8-isoPGF2α, and p66Shc expression were not affected by IGC. DNA hypomethylation and histone 3 acetylation were found on the p66Shc promoter of patients with T2D, and IGC did not change such adverse epigenetic remodeling. Persistent downregulation of methyltransferase DNMT3b and deacetylase SIRT1 may explain the observed p66Shc-related epigenetic changes. MAGE and AUCpp but not HbA1c were independently associated with the altered epigenetic profile on the p66Shc promoter. Hence, glucose fluctuations contribute to chromatin remodeling and may explain persistent vascular dysfunction in patients with T2D with target HbA1c levels.
2017
adult; case-control studies; chromatin assembly and disassembly; diabetes mellitus, type 2; endothelium, vascular; epigenesis, genetic; female; gene expression regulation; glycated hemoglobin A; humans; male; middle aged; oxidative stress; promoter regions, genetic; Src homology 2 domain-containing, transforming protein 1; up-regulation; blood glucose; internal medicine; endocrinology; diabetes and metabolism
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Impact of glycemic variability on chromatin remodeling, oxidative stress, and endothelial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and with target HbA1c levels / Costantino, Sarah; Paneni, Francesco; Battista, Rodolfo; Castello, Lorenzo; Capretti, Giuliana; Chiandotto, Sergio; Tanese, Luigi; Russo, Giulio; Pitocco, Dario; Lanza, Gaetano A.; Volpe, Massimo; Lüscher, Thomas F.; Cosentino, Francesco. - In: DIABETES. - ISSN 0012-1797. - STAMPA. - 66:9(2017), pp. 2472-2482. [10.2337/db17-0294]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Costantino_Impact-of-glycemic_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1074616
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 58
  • Scopus 135
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 125
social impact