Attitudes of primary care physicians to wards prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis have important implications in clinical practice; however, in Italy, this issue has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to determine whether the awareness and opinions of family physicians regarding the management of osteoporosis are in line with the suggestions of experts in the field. One hundred of 115 randomly selected family physicians from the area of Rome were asked to participate, and completed a survey on osteoporosis including ten close-ended questions. Response rates documented the degree of awareness about osteoporosis. Thirty-six percent of physicians make the diagnosis of osteoporosis based exclusively on bone densitometry (BD) while 17% never utilize ED. Fifty-three percent of doctors assess biochemical markers of bone turnover, but half of them are unaware of the existence of more sensitive and specific markers. Forty-four percent of physicians autonomously start therapy according to the suggestions of journal reports (38%), and/or pharmaceutical advertisements (18%). Regarding treatment follow-up, 60% of doctors gave inadequate answers, as 25% and 35% of them check bone markers after six months of therapy, and ED within one year of therapy initiation, respectively. In conclusion, experts on osteoporosis should give more attention to the education of primary care physicians regarding the management of the disease. (C) 2000, Editrice Kurtis.

Awareness, attitudes and opinions on osteoporosis of primary care physicians working in the metropolitan area of Rome: A brief report / E., Romagnoli; I., Colangeli; Minisola, Salvatore. - In: AGING. - ISSN 0394-9532. - 12:(2000), pp. 240-244.

Awareness, attitudes and opinions on osteoporosis of primary care physicians working in the metropolitan area of Rome: A brief report

MINISOLA, Salvatore
2000

Abstract

Attitudes of primary care physicians to wards prevention, diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis have important implications in clinical practice; however, in Italy, this issue has been poorly investigated. This study aimed to determine whether the awareness and opinions of family physicians regarding the management of osteoporosis are in line with the suggestions of experts in the field. One hundred of 115 randomly selected family physicians from the area of Rome were asked to participate, and completed a survey on osteoporosis including ten close-ended questions. Response rates documented the degree of awareness about osteoporosis. Thirty-six percent of physicians make the diagnosis of osteoporosis based exclusively on bone densitometry (BD) while 17% never utilize ED. Fifty-three percent of doctors assess biochemical markers of bone turnover, but half of them are unaware of the existence of more sensitive and specific markers. Forty-four percent of physicians autonomously start therapy according to the suggestions of journal reports (38%), and/or pharmaceutical advertisements (18%). Regarding treatment follow-up, 60% of doctors gave inadequate answers, as 25% and 35% of them check bone markers after six months of therapy, and ED within one year of therapy initiation, respectively. In conclusion, experts on osteoporosis should give more attention to the education of primary care physicians regarding the management of the disease. (C) 2000, Editrice Kurtis.
2000
diagnostic criteria; family physicians; osteoporosis; therapy criteria
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Awareness, attitudes and opinions on osteoporosis of primary care physicians working in the metropolitan area of Rome: A brief report / E., Romagnoli; I., Colangeli; Minisola, Salvatore. - In: AGING. - ISSN 0394-9532. - 12:(2000), pp. 240-244.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/106661
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact