The paper aims at investigating the incidence of case studies in high impact factor psychological journals and at creating a paradigm model which may conceptualize and explain the different uses and purposes of case study as research method. Overall, 6,393 articles from 16 psychological journals published in the 5-year period 2007-2011 were examined. Results show the low incidence of case studies (n=16) equal to about 0.25% out of the total. In addition, grounded theory allows the detection of two main thematic area: neuroscience and psychosocial risk. In neuroscientific research, case study seems mainly to serve as critical case in testing well-formulated theories. Instead, with regard to psychosocial risk, case study is regarded as useful for psychological intervention in both exceptional events management and best practices-related innovation in atypical fields.

What happened to the clinical approach to case study in psychological research? A clinical psychological analysis of scientific articles in high impact-factor journals / Langher, Viviana; Caputo, Andrea; Martino, Gabriella. - In: MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 2282-1619. - ELETTRONICO. - 5:3(2017), pp. 1-16. [10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1670]

What happened to the clinical approach to case study in psychological research? A clinical psychological analysis of scientific articles in high impact-factor journals

Langher, Viviana;Caputo, Andrea;
2017

Abstract

The paper aims at investigating the incidence of case studies in high impact factor psychological journals and at creating a paradigm model which may conceptualize and explain the different uses and purposes of case study as research method. Overall, 6,393 articles from 16 psychological journals published in the 5-year period 2007-2011 were examined. Results show the low incidence of case studies (n=16) equal to about 0.25% out of the total. In addition, grounded theory allows the detection of two main thematic area: neuroscience and psychosocial risk. In neuroscientific research, case study seems mainly to serve as critical case in testing well-formulated theories. Instead, with regard to psychosocial risk, case study is regarded as useful for psychological intervention in both exceptional events management and best practices-related innovation in atypical fields.
2017
Case study; impact factor; psychological research; research method; clinical psychology
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
What happened to the clinical approach to case study in psychological research? A clinical psychological analysis of scientific articles in high impact-factor journals / Langher, Viviana; Caputo, Andrea; Martino, Gabriella. - In: MEDITERRANEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 2282-1619. - ELETTRONICO. - 5:3(2017), pp. 1-16. [10.6092/2282-1619/2017.5.1670]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Langher_What-happened.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 207.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
207.16 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1064868
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact