Because of its rigour, the Italian law bearing the denomination “Regula-tions on medically assisted reproduction” has been strongly debated from the very beginning and gradually dismantled by jurisprudence. In this article, the authors re-mark that the path followed by jurisprudence is characterized by the total absence of care regarding the unborn child’s rights. The authors rather suggest that the ap-proach of jurisprudence should be guided by considerations on the substance of the law at issue, investigating all the issues involved, including those concerning the posi-tion of the unborn baby, as stated by the ratio of the same law.

The downfall of the law of 19 february 2004 n. 40: between ratio legis and parallelism whith nonequivalent legal devices [La caduta delle legge 19 febbraio 2004 n. 40: tra ratio legis e analogie con istituti non equiparabili medico] / Shalaby, O; Luzi, E; Petrone, L; Carletti, C; Ricci, S.. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - ELETTRONICO. - 2017:1(2017), pp. 135-156.

The downfall of the law of 19 february 2004 n. 40: between ratio legis and parallelism whith nonequivalent legal devices [La caduta delle legge 19 febbraio 2004 n. 40: tra ratio legis e analogie con istituti non equiparabili medico]

Luzi E;Petrone L;Carletti C;Ricci S.
2017

Abstract

Because of its rigour, the Italian law bearing the denomination “Regula-tions on medically assisted reproduction” has been strongly debated from the very beginning and gradually dismantled by jurisprudence. In this article, the authors re-mark that the path followed by jurisprudence is characterized by the total absence of care regarding the unborn child’s rights. The authors rather suggest that the ap-proach of jurisprudence should be guided by considerations on the substance of the law at issue, investigating all the issues involved, including those concerning the posi-tion of the unborn baby, as stated by the ratio of the same law.
2017
heterologous fertilization; cross border reproductive care; preimplantation genetic diagnosis; inconsistency of italian law; ratio legis
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The downfall of the law of 19 february 2004 n. 40: between ratio legis and parallelism whith nonequivalent legal devices [La caduta delle legge 19 febbraio 2004 n. 40: tra ratio legis e analogie con istituti non equiparabili medico] / Shalaby, O; Luzi, E; Petrone, L; Carletti, C; Ricci, S.. - In: BIOLAW JOURNAL. - ISSN 2284-4503. - ELETTRONICO. - 2017:1(2017), pp. 135-156.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Shalaby_Downfall_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Note: estratto
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.33 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.33 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1036315
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact