Background: There is a growing interest in the use of artificial turf surfaces in rugby. In particu- lar, artificial surfaces may be an useful means of increasing participation in the sport by allowing greater usage of a given pitch, especially in re- gions where natural turf pitches are difficult to maintain. Methods: The incidence of site, nature, cause, and severity of training and match injuries was prospectively recorded in two professional teams (one equipped with World Rugby certified third generation artificial turf and the other with natural grass over the 2014-2015 season). Results: A total of 23,840 minutes of exposure was displayed for the whole sample, 1,440 min- utes during matches and 22,400 during training sessions. We recorded 37 (48%) traumatic injuries and 39 (52%) overuse injuries. For traumatic injuries, we Corresponding author: did not find significant differences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf con- sidering match exposure and training sessions. For overuse injuries, there were significant differ- ences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf considering match exposure (p=0.03) and training sessions (p=0.02). Conclusion: In elite Italian rugby players, artificial turf seems to be safe in regards to traumatic in- jury while it seems to be a risk factor for overuse injuries.
The influence of playing surface on injury risk in italian elite rugby players / Lanzetti, Riccardo Maria; Lupariello, Domenico; Venditto, Teresa; Rota, Pierpaolo; Guzzini, Matteo; Vadalà , Antonio; Rota, Attilio; Ferretti, Andrea. - In: M.L.T.J. MUSCLES, LIGAMENTS AND TENDONS JOURNAL. - ISSN 2240-4554. - ELETTRONICO. - 7:1(2017), pp. 180-185. [10.11138/mltj/2017.7.1.180]
The influence of playing surface on injury risk in italian elite rugby players
Lanzetti, Riccardo Maria;Lupariello, Domenico
;Venditto, Teresa;Rota, Pierpaolo;Guzzini, Matteo;Ferretti, Andrea
2017
Abstract
Background: There is a growing interest in the use of artificial turf surfaces in rugby. In particu- lar, artificial surfaces may be an useful means of increasing participation in the sport by allowing greater usage of a given pitch, especially in re- gions where natural turf pitches are difficult to maintain. Methods: The incidence of site, nature, cause, and severity of training and match injuries was prospectively recorded in two professional teams (one equipped with World Rugby certified third generation artificial turf and the other with natural grass over the 2014-2015 season). Results: A total of 23,840 minutes of exposure was displayed for the whole sample, 1,440 min- utes during matches and 22,400 during training sessions. We recorded 37 (48%) traumatic injuries and 39 (52%) overuse injuries. For traumatic injuries, we Corresponding author: did not find significant differences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf con- sidering match exposure and training sessions. For overuse injuries, there were significant differ- ences in the overall risk injury between grass and artificial turf considering match exposure (p=0.03) and training sessions (p=0.02). Conclusion: In elite Italian rugby players, artificial turf seems to be safe in regards to traumatic in- jury while it seems to be a risk factor for overuse injuries.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Lanzetti_influence-of-playing_2017.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
154.61 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
154.61 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.