This study examined interpersonal co-regulation in 80 mother–infant dyads when interacting face-to-face and with an object, at the infant ages of 4 and 6 months. We found that co-regulation patterns differed between conditions and with development. Under the dyadic condition, the dyads were mostly unilateral, with only the mother attending to the infant's focus, while in the triadic context, they were mostly symmetrical, with both mother and infant mutually engaged. While confirming previous studies showing that interpersonal co-ordination is a relatively rare event in face-to-face exchanges, this result shows that the contrary is instead true when objects are available. Also, unilateral co-regulation significantly increased in the triadic context from 4 to 6 months, together with an increase in the active role of the infant during symmetrical exchanges. The development of manipulative skills that occurred during this age period might have promoted these co-regulation changes, through improvement of the infant activities with objects, both independently and with the mother. Finally, involvement in triadic interactions appears to relate to temperamental aspects, being favoured by the infant's disposition to be soothed by the caregiver. Overall, our results support the view of early social development as a context-based and multidimensional process

Mother–infant co-regulation in dyadic and triadic contexts at 4 and 6 months of age / Aureli, Tiziana; Presaghi, Fabio; Concetta Garito, Maria. - In: INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1522-7227. - STAMPA. - 27:3(2018), pp. 1-14. [10.1002/icd.2072]

Mother–infant co-regulation in dyadic and triadic contexts at 4 and 6 months of age

Tiziana Aureli
;
Fabio Presaghi;
2018

Abstract

This study examined interpersonal co-regulation in 80 mother–infant dyads when interacting face-to-face and with an object, at the infant ages of 4 and 6 months. We found that co-regulation patterns differed between conditions and with development. Under the dyadic condition, the dyads were mostly unilateral, with only the mother attending to the infant's focus, while in the triadic context, they were mostly symmetrical, with both mother and infant mutually engaged. While confirming previous studies showing that interpersonal co-ordination is a relatively rare event in face-to-face exchanges, this result shows that the contrary is instead true when objects are available. Also, unilateral co-regulation significantly increased in the triadic context from 4 to 6 months, together with an increase in the active role of the infant during symmetrical exchanges. The development of manipulative skills that occurred during this age period might have promoted these co-regulation changes, through improvement of the infant activities with objects, both independently and with the mother. Finally, involvement in triadic interactions appears to relate to temperamental aspects, being favoured by the infant's disposition to be soothed by the caregiver. Overall, our results support the view of early social development as a context-based and multidimensional process
2018
face‐to‐face and with toys interactions, interpersonal co‐regulation patterns, temperament and co‐regulation relationship
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Mother–infant co-regulation in dyadic and triadic contexts at 4 and 6 months of age / Aureli, Tiziana; Presaghi, Fabio; Concetta Garito, Maria. - In: INFANT AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT. - ISSN 1522-7227. - STAMPA. - 27:3(2018), pp. 1-14. [10.1002/icd.2072]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Aureli_Mother-Infant_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 275.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
275.65 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1038914
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact