Moral sense is defined as a feeling of fairness or unfairness of an action that knowingly causes harm to people other than the subject. It is crucial in determining human behavior and becomes pivotal in operational environments. Here we assessed whether professional daily life experience in an operational environment affects moral judgment by asking 41 military pilots ofthe ItalianAir Force (P) and 69 controls (C) to solve 40 moral dilemmas. We found that P gave more morally acceptable utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Interestingly, men and women in P equally accepted utilitarian resolutions of moral dilemmas, whereas in C women were less prone than men to accept utilitarian responses. We conclude that professional daily life experience of P, in an operational environment, affects moral judgment and mitigates gender predisposition towards moral dilemmas.

Effect of professional expertise and exposure to everyday life decision-making on moral choices / Boccia, Maddalena; Verde, Paola; Angelino, Gregorio; Carrozzo, Paolo; Vecchi, Diego; Piccardi, Laura; Colangeli, Stefano; Cordellieri, Pierluigi; Ferlazzo, Fabio; Giannini, Anna Maria. - In: NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS. - ISSN 0304-3940. - 654:(2017), pp. 80-85. [10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.036]

Effect of professional expertise and exposure to everyday life decision-making on moral choices

Boccia, Maddalena;Verde, Paola;Piccardi, Laura;Colangeli, Stefano;Cordellieri, Pierluigi;Ferlazzo, Fabio;Giannini, Anna Maria
2017

Abstract

Moral sense is defined as a feeling of fairness or unfairness of an action that knowingly causes harm to people other than the subject. It is crucial in determining human behavior and becomes pivotal in operational environments. Here we assessed whether professional daily life experience in an operational environment affects moral judgment by asking 41 military pilots ofthe ItalianAir Force (P) and 69 controls (C) to solve 40 moral dilemmas. We found that P gave more morally acceptable utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Interestingly, men and women in P equally accepted utilitarian resolutions of moral dilemmas, whereas in C women were less prone than men to accept utilitarian responses. We conclude that professional daily life experience of P, in an operational environment, affects moral judgment and mitigates gender predisposition towards moral dilemmas.
2017
flight experience; gender differences; military personnel; moral decision-making; moral dilemmas; moral judgment; pilot; neuroscience (all)
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Effect of professional expertise and exposure to everyday life decision-making on moral choices / Boccia, Maddalena; Verde, Paola; Angelino, Gregorio; Carrozzo, Paolo; Vecchi, Diego; Piccardi, Laura; Colangeli, Stefano; Cordellieri, Pierluigi; Ferlazzo, Fabio; Giannini, Anna Maria. - In: NEUROSCIENCE LETTERS. - ISSN 0304-3940. - 654:(2017), pp. 80-85. [10.1016/j.neulet.2017.06.036]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
boccia_effect_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 736.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
736.65 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1019442
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 10
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact