Aim The aim of this review was to systematically review systematic and narrative reviews of observational studies published on the relation between tobacco smoking and multiple sclerosis (MS). Subjects and methods A systematic search of the literature in PubMed and Scopus was conducted in June 2016. Two authors independently reviewed the search results and extracted key points. Review studies (i.e., review, systematic, narrative, or meta-analysis) that reported on smoking and MS were selected. The methodological quality of included systematic reviews and meta-analyses was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist. The methodological quality of narrative reviews was evaluated using a seven-item measure developed by the authors. Results Seventeen reviews met the inclusion criteria and were categorized as either systematic reviews or narrative reviews. Smoking was associated with increased risk of MS for evercompared with never-smokers and current compared with non-smokers. The summary odds ratio of MS for eversmokers versus never-smokers varied between 1.40 (95% CI: 1.29–1.52) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.33–1.59). Conclusion This review of reviews identifies smoking as a risk factor for MS susceptibility. However, more research is needed to conclusively establish the mechanisms driving this association.

Tobacco smoking and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic and narrative reviews of observational studies / Backhaus, Insa; Mannocci, Alice; La Torre, Giuseppe. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FüR GESUNDHEITSWISSENSCHAFTEN. - ISSN 0943-1853. - (2017). [10.1007/s10389-017-0811-6]

Tobacco smoking and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic and narrative reviews of observational studies

Backhaus, Insa;Mannocci, Alice;La Torre, Giuseppe
2017

Abstract

Aim The aim of this review was to systematically review systematic and narrative reviews of observational studies published on the relation between tobacco smoking and multiple sclerosis (MS). Subjects and methods A systematic search of the literature in PubMed and Scopus was conducted in June 2016. Two authors independently reviewed the search results and extracted key points. Review studies (i.e., review, systematic, narrative, or meta-analysis) that reported on smoking and MS were selected. The methodological quality of included systematic reviews and meta-analyses was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist. The methodological quality of narrative reviews was evaluated using a seven-item measure developed by the authors. Results Seventeen reviews met the inclusion criteria and were categorized as either systematic reviews or narrative reviews. Smoking was associated with increased risk of MS for evercompared with never-smokers and current compared with non-smokers. The summary odds ratio of MS for eversmokers versus never-smokers varied between 1.40 (95% CI: 1.29–1.52) and 1.46 (95% CI: 1.33–1.59). Conclusion This review of reviews identifies smoking as a risk factor for MS susceptibility. However, more research is needed to conclusively establish the mechanisms driving this association.
2017
multiple sclerosis; smoking; systematic review; tobacco; public health, environmental and occupational health
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Tobacco smoking and multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic and narrative reviews of observational studies / Backhaus, Insa; Mannocci, Alice; La Torre, Giuseppe. - In: ZEITSCHRIFT FüR GESUNDHEITSWISSENSCHAFTEN. - ISSN 0943-1853. - (2017). [10.1007/s10389-017-0811-6]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bachkhaus_Tobacco_2017.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 508.75 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
508.75 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1015237
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact