Word Sense Disambiguation is a longstanding task in Natural Language Processing, lying at the core of human language understanding. However, the evaluation of automatic systems has been problematic, mainly due to the lack of a reliable evaluation framework. In this paper we develop a unified evaluation framework and analyze the performance of various Word Sense Disambiguation systems in a fair setup. The results show that supervised systems clearly outperform knowledge-based models. Among the supervised systems, a linear classi- fier trained on conventional local features still proves to be a hard baseline to beat. Nonetheless, recent approaches exploiting neural networks on unlabeled corpora achieve promising results, surpassing this hard baseline in most test sets.
Word sense disambiguation: a uinified evaluation framework and empirical comparison / Raganato, Alessandro; Camacho-collados, Jose; Navigli, Roberto. - ELETTRONICO. - 1:(2017), pp. 99-110. (Intervento presentato al convegno 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics tenutosi a Valencia nel 3-7 Aprile 2017).
Word sense disambiguation: a uinified evaluation framework and empirical comparison
Raganato, Alessandro;Camacho-collados, Jose;Navigli, Roberto
2017
Abstract
Word Sense Disambiguation is a longstanding task in Natural Language Processing, lying at the core of human language understanding. However, the evaluation of automatic systems has been problematic, mainly due to the lack of a reliable evaluation framework. In this paper we develop a unified evaluation framework and analyze the performance of various Word Sense Disambiguation systems in a fair setup. The results show that supervised systems clearly outperform knowledge-based models. Among the supervised systems, a linear classi- fier trained on conventional local features still proves to be a hard baseline to beat. Nonetheless, recent approaches exploiting neural networks on unlabeled corpora achieve promising results, surpassing this hard baseline in most test sets.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Raganato_Word_2017.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
275.96 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
275.96 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.