Introduction The present research highlights the importance of subordinates' motivation for compliance-related phenomena. Objectives The aim of this research was to examine subordinates' willingness to comply with their supervisors' harsh and soft power tactics as a function of subordinates' need for cognitive closure. Method Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in five different Italian organizations, namely, a bank, a federation of small businesses, a security company, an oil company, and a hospital. Results It was found that subordinates high (vs. low) on need for closure reported greater willingness to comply with harsh social power tactics, but lower willingness to comply with soft power tactics. Conclusion Our findings nuance prior research by showing that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always the most effective power tactics in organizational setting (e.g., Pierro et al., 2004; Raven et al., 1998)
Social power tactics and subordinates' compliance at work. The role of need for cognitive closure / Bèlanger, J. J.; Pierro, Antonio; Kruglanski, A. W.. - In: REVUE EUROPÉENNE DE PSYCHOLOGUE APPLIQUÉE. - ISSN 1162-9088. - STAMPA. - 65:4(2015), pp. 163-169. [10.1016/j.erap.2015.05.001]
Social power tactics and subordinates' compliance at work. The role of need for cognitive closure
PIERRO, Antonio;
2015
Abstract
Introduction The present research highlights the importance of subordinates' motivation for compliance-related phenomena. Objectives The aim of this research was to examine subordinates' willingness to comply with their supervisors' harsh and soft power tactics as a function of subordinates' need for cognitive closure. Method Two cross-sectional studies were conducted in five different Italian organizations, namely, a bank, a federation of small businesses, a security company, an oil company, and a hospital. Results It was found that subordinates high (vs. low) on need for closure reported greater willingness to comply with harsh social power tactics, but lower willingness to comply with soft power tactics. Conclusion Our findings nuance prior research by showing that soft (vs. harsh) power tactics are not always the most effective power tactics in organizational setting (e.g., Pierro et al., 2004; Raven et al., 1998)File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bélanger_Social_2015.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
431.5 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
431.5 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.