Smart Dust is comprised of a vast number of ultra-small fully autonomous computing and communication devices, with very restricted energy and computing capabilities, that co-operate to accomplish a large sensing task. Smart Dust can be very useful in practice i.e. in the local detection of a remote crucial event and the propagation of data reporting its realization to a control center. In this work, we have implemented and experimentally evaluated four protocols (PFR, LTP and two variations of LTP which we here introduce) for local detection and propagation in smart dust networks, under new, more general and realistic modelling assumptions. We comparatively study, by using extensive experiments, their behavior highlighting their relative advantages and disadvantages. All protocols are very successful. In the setting we considered here, PFR seems to be faster while the LTP based protocols are more energy efficient. © Springer-Verlag 2003.

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks / Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis; Dimitriou, T.; Mavronicolas, M.; Nikoletseas, S.; Spirakis, P.. - STAMPA. - 2790(2004), pp. 1003-1016. - LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE.

A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks

CHATZIGIANNAKIS, IOANNIS;
2004

Abstract

Smart Dust is comprised of a vast number of ultra-small fully autonomous computing and communication devices, with very restricted energy and computing capabilities, that co-operate to accomplish a large sensing task. Smart Dust can be very useful in practice i.e. in the local detection of a remote crucial event and the propagation of data reporting its realization to a control center. In this work, we have implemented and experimentally evaluated four protocols (PFR, LTP and two variations of LTP which we here introduce) for local detection and propagation in smart dust networks, under new, more general and realistic modelling assumptions. We comparatively study, by using extensive experiments, their behavior highlighting their relative advantages and disadvantages. All protocols are very successful. In the setting we considered here, PFR seems to be faster while the LTP based protocols are more energy efficient. © Springer-Verlag 2003.
2004
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
study; protocols; efficient
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
A Comparative Study of Protocols for Efficient Data Propagation in Smart Dust Networks / Chatzigiannakis, Ioannis; Dimitriou, T.; Mavronicolas, M.; Nikoletseas, S.; Spirakis, P.. - STAMPA. - 2790(2004), pp. 1003-1016. - LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
VE_2004_11573-945335.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 292.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
292.07 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/945335
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact