Hino Ashihei (1907-1960) travelled to China in the spring of 1955 and produced a travelogue significantly entitled Akai kuni no tabibito (Traveller in the red country). Three aspects stand out in his account: the description and criticism of Mao’s China, a reflection on his per- sonal and Japan’s war responsibilities, and a judgment of his fellow travellers, which included some noted leftists. In this study I define the circumstances surrounding Hino’s work and analyse it basing on the above-mentioned three aspects. I argue that while this work cannot be taken as a definitive stance on the issue of war responsibilities, it nevertheless contains a clear-cut criticism of the totalitarianism that could be found not only in Mao’s guidance but in Japan’s past as well. Moreover, the dissatisfaction with the blinkered attitude of Japan’s Marxists suggests that the time was still not ripe for a reliable discussion of Japan’s war past.
Il contributo analizza il resoconto di viaggio in Cina dell'autore giapponese Hino Ashihei, nella primavera del 1955. Nel resoconto l'autore intreccia tre temi: la descrizione della Cina maoista, la riflessione sulle proprie personali responsabilità di guerra e su quelle del Giappone, e la riflessione sulla sinistra giapponese coeva. L'analisi mostra come vi sia nell'opera una netta critica al totalitarismo di Mao, paragonato a quello giapponese del periodo bellico, e come l'atteggiamento della sinistra non consenta ancora una seria riflessione sull'esperienza bellica del Giappone.
Il “paese rosso” di Hino Ashihei: la Nuova Cina tra l’ombra del passato e la critica del presente / Romagnoli, Stefano. - STAMPA. - (2014), pp. 175-194. - COLLANA DI STUDI GIAPPONESI. RICERCHE.
Il “paese rosso” di Hino Ashihei: la Nuova Cina tra l’ombra del passato e la critica del presente
ROMAGNOLI, STEFANO
2014
Abstract
Hino Ashihei (1907-1960) travelled to China in the spring of 1955 and produced a travelogue significantly entitled Akai kuni no tabibito (Traveller in the red country). Three aspects stand out in his account: the description and criticism of Mao’s China, a reflection on his per- sonal and Japan’s war responsibilities, and a judgment of his fellow travellers, which included some noted leftists. In this study I define the circumstances surrounding Hino’s work and analyse it basing on the above-mentioned three aspects. I argue that while this work cannot be taken as a definitive stance on the issue of war responsibilities, it nevertheless contains a clear-cut criticism of the totalitarianism that could be found not only in Mao’s guidance but in Japan’s past as well. Moreover, the dissatisfaction with the blinkered attitude of Japan’s Marxists suggests that the time was still not ripe for a reliable discussion of Japan’s war past.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.