In this chapter, part of the research carried out within the SECOA project (www.projectsecoa.eu) is presented. Attention is devoted to methods and tools used for supporting the participatory process in a case of environmental conflict related to the definition of boundaries of a coastal protected area: the Costa Teatina National Park, in Abruzzo, central Italy. The Costa Teatina National Park was established by the National Law 93/2001. Its territory includes eight southern Abruzzo municipalities and covers a stretch of coastline of approximately 60 km. It is a coastal protected area, which incorporates land but not sea, characterized by the presence of important cultural and natural assets. The Italian Ministry of Environment (1998) defines the area as “winding and varied, with the alternation of sandy and gravel beaches, cliffs, river mouths, areas rich in indigenous vegetation and cultivated lands (mainly olives), dunes and forest trees”. The park boundaries were not defined by the law that set it up, and their determination has been postponed to a later stage of territorial negotiation that has not ended yet (Montanari and Staniscia, 2013). The definition of the park boundaries, indeed, has resulted in an intense debate between citizens and interest groups who believe that environmental protection does not conflict with economic growth and those who believe the opposite. That is why the process is still in act and a solution is far from being reached. In this chapter, the methodology and the tools used to involve the general public in active participation in decision making and to support institutional players in conflict mitigation will be presented. Those tools have also proven to be effective in the dissemination of information and transfer of knowledge. Results obtained through the use of each instrument will not be presented here since this falls outside the purpose of the present essay. The chapter is organized as follows: in the first section the importance of the theme of citizen participation in decision making will be highlighted; the focus will be on participation in the processes of ICZM, relevant to the management of coastal protected areas. In the second section a review of the most commonly used methods in social research is presented; advantages and disadvantages of each of them will be highlighted. In particular, the history and the evolution of the Delphi method and its derivatives are discussed; focus will be on the dissemination value of the logic underlying such iterative methods. In the third section the tools used in the case of the Costa Teatina National Park will be presented; strengths and weaknesses will be highlighted and proposals for their improvement will be advanced. Discussion and conclusions follow.
Citizen participation and awareness raising in coastal protected areas. A case study from Italy / S., Di Zio; Staniscia, Barbara. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 155-196.
|Titolo:||Citizen participation and awareness raising in coastal protected areas. A case study from Italy|
|Data di pubblicazione:||2014|
|Citazione:||Citizen participation and awareness raising in coastal protected areas. A case study from Italy / S., Di Zio; Staniscia, Barbara. - ELETTRONICO. - (2014), pp. 155-196.|
|Appartiene alla tipologia:||02a Capitolo o Articolo|
File allegati a questo prodotto
|Staniscia_Citizen_2014.pdf||Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)||Open Access Visualizza/Apri|
|Staniscia_copertina_Citizen _2014.pdf||Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)||Open Access Visualizza/Apri|