Our contribution aims at highlighting what we consider as a fundamental ambiguity of the relationship between planning and conflict, a point of view which deserves a wider and deeper reflection in planning theory, whilst more developed, with its own specificities, in policy analysis. In fact, policy analysis considers the inherent conflict potential of planning processes, particularly as the sign of different social demands and rationalities and consequently as a field of inquiry of public policy effectiveness and democratic legitimacy. Differently, planning practices often left these issues as implicit. In our research, we tried to bring nearer the two disciplinary approaches, making use of both the range of analytical and interpretive tools they provide. Through an in-depth case-study analysis, we aim at overcoming here what we see as a sort of simplified duality determined by considering planning as the source or origin of conflict or, vice versa, as a tool for conflict resolution.

A Muddled Landscape of Conflicts: What we can Learn about Planning/Conflict Relationship from the Story of Tor Marancia, Rome, and its Unexpected Shift / Pizzo, Barbara; DI SALVO, Giacomina. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 99-120.

A Muddled Landscape of Conflicts: What we can Learn about Planning/Conflict Relationship from the Story of Tor Marancia, Rome, and its Unexpected Shift

PIZZO, BARBARA;DI SALVO, Giacomina
2015

Abstract

Our contribution aims at highlighting what we consider as a fundamental ambiguity of the relationship between planning and conflict, a point of view which deserves a wider and deeper reflection in planning theory, whilst more developed, with its own specificities, in policy analysis. In fact, policy analysis considers the inherent conflict potential of planning processes, particularly as the sign of different social demands and rationalities and consequently as a field of inquiry of public policy effectiveness and democratic legitimacy. Differently, planning practices often left these issues as implicit. In our research, we tried to bring nearer the two disciplinary approaches, making use of both the range of analytical and interpretive tools they provide. Through an in-depth case-study analysis, we aim at overcoming here what we see as a sort of simplified duality determined by considering planning as the source or origin of conflict or, vice versa, as a tool for conflict resolution.
2015
Planning/Conflict. Critical Perspectives on Contentious Urban Developments
978-04-158-3585-5
planning and conflict; conflicts on land use; scalar shift and the policies of scale; planning and policy analysis
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
A Muddled Landscape of Conflicts: What we can Learn about Planning/Conflict Relationship from the Story of Tor Marancia, Rome, and its Unexpected Shift / Pizzo, Barbara; DI SALVO, Giacomina. - STAMPA. - (2015), pp. 99-120.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Pizzo__A Muddled Landscape_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: Articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.73 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.73 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/529853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact