This paper analyzes critically the innovations in the field of incompatibility: first of all the legislative news that he tried to stop the flow of declarations of unconstitutionality that have hit the art. 34 Code of Criminal Procedure In particular, we analyze: 1) the general framework of the incompatibility of the criminal court, and 2) the incompatibility and art. 111, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, and 3) the incompatibility and art. 6, § 1, C. Eur Dir man, and 4) the new arrangement art. 34 Code of Criminal Procedure judged between constitutional and legislative constraints and consequent interpretation; 5) the preliminary hearing as a venue prejudiced; 6) the incompatibility of office.
Il lavoro analizza in chiave critica le novità in materia di incompatibilità: prima fra tutte la novella legislativa che ha provato ad interrompere il flusso delle dichiarazioni di incostituzionalità che hanno colpito l'art. 34 c.p.p. In particolare si analizza: 1) il quadro generale delle incompatibilità del giudice penale; 2) l’incompatibilità e l’art. 111, comma 2, Cost.; 3) l’incompatibilità e l’art. 6, § 1, C. Eur. Dir. uomo; 4) il nuovo assetto dell’art. 34 c.p.p. fra giudicati costituzionali e conseguenti vincoli legislativi e interpretativi; 5) l’udienza preliminare quale sede pregiudicata; 6) gli artt. 18 e 19 ord. giud.: le c.d. incompatibilità di sede.
Incompatibilità del giudice(Dir. proc. pen.) / Aprati, Roberta. - XIII(2008), pp. 1-8.
Incompatibilità del giudice(Dir. proc. pen.)
APRATI, ROBERTA
2008
Abstract
This paper analyzes critically the innovations in the field of incompatibility: first of all the legislative news that he tried to stop the flow of declarations of unconstitutionality that have hit the art. 34 Code of Criminal Procedure In particular, we analyze: 1) the general framework of the incompatibility of the criminal court, and 2) the incompatibility and art. 111, paragraph 2, of the Constitution, and 3) the incompatibility and art. 6, § 1, C. Eur Dir man, and 4) the new arrangement art. 34 Code of Criminal Procedure judged between constitutional and legislative constraints and consequent interpretation; 5) the preliminary hearing as a venue prejudiced; 6) the incompatibility of office.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.