This essay offers a reconsideration of Jacques Derrida’s posthumous tribute to Sarah Kofman by examining its philosophical, autobiographical, and confessional dimensions. Taking as its point of departure Kofman’s final writings on death—La mort conjurée and La mort blanche—and their singular relation to Derrida’s work, the essay reconstructs a posthumous dialogue structured by the logic of impossibility, doubling, distance, and inheritance. Particular attention is devoted to Derrida’s reading of La mort conjurée, Kofman’s interpretation of Rembrandt’s The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp. While taking up Kofman’s analysis of the repression of death and the irruption of life, Derrida simultaneously repeats and displaces its scene, reinscribing it within his own thinking of life-death and the impossible. The essay argues, however, that this theoretical proximity also reveals a decisive distance between the two philosophers. By reconstructing some of their philosophical différends, especially concerning Auschwitz, memory, and the tension between the singularity and the universalization of death, Derrida’s tribute emerges also as a belated attempt to resume a dialogue that had remained unresolved. His concluding reflection on impossible forgiveness, addressed to “Sarah in me,” thus brings into view both the proximity and the irreducible distance between their respective positions. Kofman’s “impossible legacy” can consequently be understood as an inheritance that resists full appropriation and continues, beyond death, to call the thought of the other into question.
Il saggio propone una rilettura dell’omaggio postumo dedicato da Jacques Derrida a Sarah Kofman, interrogandone il carattere insieme filosofico, autobiografico e confessionale. A partire dagli ultimi scritti di Kofman sulla morte – La mort conjurée e La mort blanche – e dalla loro singolare relazione con l’opera derridiana, l’analisi ricostruisce un dialogo post mortem segnato dalla logica dell’impossibile, del doppio, della distanza e dell’eredità. Particolare attenzione è riservata alla lettura derridiana di La mort conjurée, dedicato alla Lezione di anatomia del dottor Tulp di Rembrandt: nel riprendere l’interpretazione kofmaniana della rimozione della morte e dell’irruzione della vita, Derrida ne riproduce e insieme ne sposta la scena, inscrivendola nella propria riflessione sulla vita-morte e sull’impossibile. Il saggio sostiene tuttavia che tale prossimità teorica lasci emergere anche una distanza decisiva. Attraverso la ricostruzione di alcuni différends filosofici tra Kofman e Derrida, in particolare intorno ad Auschwitz, alla memoria e al rapporto tra singolarità e universalizzazione della morte, viene mostrato come l’omaggio derridiano possa essere letto anche come il tentativo tardivo di riprendere un confronto rimasto sospeso. La riflessione conclusiva sul perdono impossibile, destinata da Derrida a «Sarah in me», rende così visibile tanto la prossimità quanto l’irriducibile distanza tra i due pensieri. Il “lascito impossibile” di Kofman si configura allora come un’eredità che resiste alla piena appropriazione e continua a interrogare, oltre la morte, il pensiero dell’altro.
Un lascito impossibile. La lettura derridiana post-mortem di Sarah Kofman / Ombrosi, Orietta. - (2026), pp. 141-181.
Un lascito impossibile. La lettura derridiana post-mortem di Sarah Kofman
Orietta Ombrosi
2026
Abstract
This essay offers a reconsideration of Jacques Derrida’s posthumous tribute to Sarah Kofman by examining its philosophical, autobiographical, and confessional dimensions. Taking as its point of departure Kofman’s final writings on death—La mort conjurée and La mort blanche—and their singular relation to Derrida’s work, the essay reconstructs a posthumous dialogue structured by the logic of impossibility, doubling, distance, and inheritance. Particular attention is devoted to Derrida’s reading of La mort conjurée, Kofman’s interpretation of Rembrandt’s The Anatomy Lesson of Dr. Tulp. While taking up Kofman’s analysis of the repression of death and the irruption of life, Derrida simultaneously repeats and displaces its scene, reinscribing it within his own thinking of life-death and the impossible. The essay argues, however, that this theoretical proximity also reveals a decisive distance between the two philosophers. By reconstructing some of their philosophical différends, especially concerning Auschwitz, memory, and the tension between the singularity and the universalization of death, Derrida’s tribute emerges also as a belated attempt to resume a dialogue that had remained unresolved. His concluding reflection on impossible forgiveness, addressed to “Sarah in me,” thus brings into view both the proximity and the irreducible distance between their respective positions. Kofman’s “impossible legacy” can consequently be understood as an inheritance that resists full appropriation and continues, beyond death, to call the thought of the other into question.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


