Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a crucial role in enhancing human well-being by providing intangible benefits such as spiritual enrichment, aesthetic enjoyment, and cultural identity. However, defining and categorizing CES presents a significant challenge due to their subjective nature and multifaceted dimensions. This paper critically examines various approaches adopted in defining and conceptualizing CES within the realm of ecosystem services research. Through a review of existing literature, we explore the diversity of perspectives and methodologies used to identify, assess, and classify cultural services provided by ecosystems. Various approaches exist for spatial identification of CES, ranging from territorial indicator-based methods to philosophical theories. However, literature analysis reveals the difficulty in universally defining evaluation methods applicable to all cases. While macrolevel guidelines aid in recognizing potential CES, contextual analysis of structural elements is necessary. Integrating a system for assessing immaterial values can track both material and non-material benefits of CES within the territory. This suggests a context-based approach for both identification and evaluation of CES, essential for effective planning processes. By synthesizing diverse conceptualizations and methodological approaches, this paper aims to contribute to a deeper comprehension of the complexities inherent in defining and valuing cultural ecosystem services, ultimately fostering more effective conservation and sustainable management strategies.
Exploring Approaches to Define Cultural Ecosystem Services in Planning Support System / Perrone, F., Gatto, R.V.. - (2024), pp. 387-395. (Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2024 Workshops Hanoi Vietnam ) [10.1007/978-3-031-65273-8_25].
Exploring Approaches to Define Cultural Ecosystem Services in Planning Support System
Perrone, Francesca;
2024
Abstract
Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a crucial role in enhancing human well-being by providing intangible benefits such as spiritual enrichment, aesthetic enjoyment, and cultural identity. However, defining and categorizing CES presents a significant challenge due to their subjective nature and multifaceted dimensions. This paper critically examines various approaches adopted in defining and conceptualizing CES within the realm of ecosystem services research. Through a review of existing literature, we explore the diversity of perspectives and methodologies used to identify, assess, and classify cultural services provided by ecosystems. Various approaches exist for spatial identification of CES, ranging from territorial indicator-based methods to philosophical theories. However, literature analysis reveals the difficulty in universally defining evaluation methods applicable to all cases. While macrolevel guidelines aid in recognizing potential CES, contextual analysis of structural elements is necessary. Integrating a system for assessing immaterial values can track both material and non-material benefits of CES within the territory. This suggests a context-based approach for both identification and evaluation of CES, essential for effective planning processes. By synthesizing diverse conceptualizations and methodological approaches, this paper aims to contribute to a deeper comprehension of the complexities inherent in defining and valuing cultural ecosystem services, ultimately fostering more effective conservation and sustainable management strategies.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Perrone_Exploring_2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
2.36 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.36 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


