This paper reconstructs a short story in the troubled reception process of transcendental idealism. As is well known, some interpreted it as a radical form of idealism, not very different from that proposed by Berkeley, while others found a substantial similarity with the Leibnizian doctrine of pre-established harmony. Through the reconstruction of a polyphonic debate, it will be argued that Kant considered these problems resolved with the second edition of the Deduction of the Categories, where he describes transcendental philosophy as an epigenetic system. It will thus be shown the relevance of the review as a tool for philosophical discussion in the eighteenth century, highlighting the influence that two reviews had in the history of the Deduction.

A system of “higher idealism”, of “preformation”, or of the “epigenesis of pure reason”? Kant’s response to the first review of the KrV and to Schultz’s review of Ulrich’s Institutiones logicae / Bucarelli, Anna Leonilde. - (2026), pp. 187-206. [10.36253/979-12-215-0999-1.12].

A system of “higher idealism”, of “preformation”, or of the “epigenesis of pure reason”? Kant’s response to the first review of the KrV and to Schultz’s review of Ulrich’s Institutiones logicae

Anna Leonilde Bucarelli
2026

Abstract

This paper reconstructs a short story in the troubled reception process of transcendental idealism. As is well known, some interpreted it as a radical form of idealism, not very different from that proposed by Berkeley, while others found a substantial similarity with the Leibnizian doctrine of pre-established harmony. Through the reconstruction of a polyphonic debate, it will be argued that Kant considered these problems resolved with the second edition of the Deduction of the Categories, where he describes transcendental philosophy as an epigenetic system. It will thus be shown the relevance of the review as a tool for philosophical discussion in the eighteenth century, highlighting the influence that two reviews had in the history of the Deduction.
2026
Philosophical reviews in German territories (1668-1799) Volume 2
scepticism; idealism; preformation; deduction; epigenesis
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
A system of “higher idealism”, of “preformation”, or of the “epigenesis of pure reason”? Kant’s response to the first review of the KrV and to Schultz’s review of Ulrich’s Institutiones logicae / Bucarelli, Anna Leonilde. - (2026), pp. 187-206. [10.36253/979-12-215-0999-1.12].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Bucarelli_System-of-higher-idealism_2026.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 440.44 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
440.44 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1771046
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact