The text examines the issue of the adaptive reuse of abandoned architecture, a topic of increasing relevance in contemporary discourse on land-use reduction and the valorization of the built environment. Whereas the demolition and replacement of non-protected buildings once constituted the predominant strategy, current approaches emphasize the material, historical, and symbolic significance embedded within pre-existing structures. Buildings are thus interpreted as repositories of memory and stratification, whose traces the design process must decipher and translate into resources for renewed spatial configurations. Marco Biraghi identifies three principal modes of intervention: restoration, conservation, and reuse—the latter conceived as a creative synthesis between new and existing elements, capable of producing modification and innovation without annulling the original fabric. Reuse becomes a process of stratification whereby the project overlays the existing architectural envelope with varying degrees of intensity, generating reversible and temporally contingent transformations that operate as additions to the building’s permanent structural core. Giuseppina Grasso Cannizzo conceives reuse as an endeavour requiring attentive observation, profound knowledge of place, and openness to unconventional practices—such as violation, inversion, or intrusion—aimed at unveiling the latent potential of the pre-existing. The intervention must proceed discreetly, calibrated on a case-by-case basis, and make use of heterogeneous and occasionally contradictory tools, ranging from implementation to conservation. This stance, grounded in the Italian tradition of “creative restoration” established by Albini and Scarpa, resonates with numerous recent European practices—for instance, those of Flores & Prats, Carmassi, and Nouvel—which reinterpret existing buildings as narrative palimpsests. The text concludes with a concrete application: the feasibility studies for the Santa Maria della Pietà complex in Rome, undertaken within the framework of the PNRR. This experience illustrates how an approach rooted in critical analysis and in the valorization of the dialectical relationship between container and content can guide innovative interventions capable of regenerating architectural spaces while preserving the material memory that constitutes their enduring identity.
Il testo affronta il tema del recupero dell’architettura dismessa, questione centrale per ridurre il consumo di suolo e valorizzare il patrimonio costruito. Se in passato la demolizione e sostituzione degli edifici non vincolati era la soluzione prevalente, oggi prevale un approccio più attento al valore materiale, storico e simbolico delle preesistenze. Gli edifici vengono letti come contenitori di memorie e stratificazioni che il progetto deve saper interpretare, trasformando le tracce del passato in risorse per la nuova configurazione spaziale. Marco Biraghi distingue tre modalità d’intervento: restauro, conservazione e riuso, quest’ultimo inteso come integrazione creativa tra nuovo ed esistente, capace di modificare e innovare senza azzerare il costruito. Il riuso diventa così un processo di stratificazione, in cui il progetto si sovrappone agli involucri esistenti con intensità variabile, generando trasformazioni reversibili e temporanee, considerate aggiunte al corpo permanente dell’edificio. Giuseppina Grasso Cannizzo interpreta il riuso come un’azione che richiede ascolto, conoscenza profonda dei luoghi e apertura a pratiche non convenzionali — violazione, ribaltamento, intrusione — per far emergere le potenzialità latenti delle preesistenze. L’intervento deve essere discreto, calibrato caso per caso, capace di utilizzare strumenti diversi e talvolta contraddittori, dall’implementazione alla conservazione. Questo approccio, radicato nella tradizione italiana del “restauro creativo” inaugurata da Albini e Scarpa, si ritrova anche in molte esperienze europee recenti, come quelle degli archh. Flores & Prats, Carmassi e Nouvel, che rileggono gli edifici esistenti come palinsesti narrativi. Il testo si conclude con un esempio applicativo: gli studi di fattibilità per il complesso di Santa Maria della Pietà a Roma, sviluppati nell’ambito del PNRR. Tale esperienza mostra come un approccio fondato sull’analisi critica e sulla valorizzazione del rapporto tra contenitore e contenuto possa orientare interventi innovativi, capaci di rigenerare gli spazi senza annullare la memoria materiale che li costituisce.
Il recupero di architetture dismesse / Grimaldi, Andrea. - (2025), pp. 207-222.
Il recupero di architetture dismesse
Andrea Grimaldi
2025
Abstract
The text examines the issue of the adaptive reuse of abandoned architecture, a topic of increasing relevance in contemporary discourse on land-use reduction and the valorization of the built environment. Whereas the demolition and replacement of non-protected buildings once constituted the predominant strategy, current approaches emphasize the material, historical, and symbolic significance embedded within pre-existing structures. Buildings are thus interpreted as repositories of memory and stratification, whose traces the design process must decipher and translate into resources for renewed spatial configurations. Marco Biraghi identifies three principal modes of intervention: restoration, conservation, and reuse—the latter conceived as a creative synthesis between new and existing elements, capable of producing modification and innovation without annulling the original fabric. Reuse becomes a process of stratification whereby the project overlays the existing architectural envelope with varying degrees of intensity, generating reversible and temporally contingent transformations that operate as additions to the building’s permanent structural core. Giuseppina Grasso Cannizzo conceives reuse as an endeavour requiring attentive observation, profound knowledge of place, and openness to unconventional practices—such as violation, inversion, or intrusion—aimed at unveiling the latent potential of the pre-existing. The intervention must proceed discreetly, calibrated on a case-by-case basis, and make use of heterogeneous and occasionally contradictory tools, ranging from implementation to conservation. This stance, grounded in the Italian tradition of “creative restoration” established by Albini and Scarpa, resonates with numerous recent European practices—for instance, those of Flores & Prats, Carmassi, and Nouvel—which reinterpret existing buildings as narrative palimpsests. The text concludes with a concrete application: the feasibility studies for the Santa Maria della Pietà complex in Rome, undertaken within the framework of the PNRR. This experience illustrates how an approach rooted in critical analysis and in the valorization of the dialectical relationship between container and content can guide innovative interventions capable of regenerating architectural spaces while preserving the material memory that constitutes their enduring identity.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Grimaldi_Recupero-architetture-dismesse_2025.pdf
embargo fino al 30/04/2026
Note: frontespizio, indice, articolo
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
485.68 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
485.68 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


