Unlike what can be observed in many countries around the world, in the imagination of the Italian ruling classes – political, intellectual, academic, and professional – urban public space still coincides with the traditional spaces of squares and streets in city centers, especially those of the so-called historic centers. In Italy, every contempo-rary event “worth its salt” still seems to have to take place in those beautiful, well-known, and yet worn-out places, built from antiquity up to the early decades of the 20th century: flexible, porous, and vital urban envi-ronments that now primarily serve as scenic sets for contemporary communication. Today, television and, especially, social platforms are flooded with thousands of photographic and video images, almost always self-produced through smartphones, providing a horizontal, uncritical communication that documents places through individual and partial visions. We witness an obsessive and stereotyped representation of the urban landscape, seemingly free and democratic but almost al-ways strongly influenced by contemporary consumption rituals. Rituals that reproduce the world as a backdrop for selfies, i.e., narcissistic images to be immediately posted on social media. The visual-consumerist enjoyment of the landscape affects both tourists and all people, young and old, who visit, stroll, or shop in the wonderful places we have inherited from the past. They experience the exhilarat-ing aesthetic experiences offered by numerous shops, bars, typical taverns, exotic restaurants, monu-ments, galleries, museums, and events of all kinds, located on the urban surface of historic centers. In a certain sense, however, today’s public space seems to reject the characteristics that have de-fined it as “the urban phenomenon” par excellence for centuries, instead taking on meanings, func-tions, and forms typical of recreational areas, laid out on natural or artificial grounds. It has trans-formed into a fun and hedonistic place, endowed with features that, until a certain point, were at-tributed to the disciplines of garden and landscape architecture: those of playgrounds and large urban parks full of sports and recreational activities.
A differenza di ciò che si può osservare in molti paesi del mondo, nell’immaginario delle classi diri-genti italiane – politiche, intellettuali, accademiche e professionali – ancor oggi lo spazio pubblico urbano coincide con quello tradizionale delle piazze e delle strade delle aree centrali delle città, meglio ancora se dei cosiddetti centri storici. In effetti, in Italia ogni evento contemporaneo “che si rispetti” sembra debba ancora avvenire in quei bellissimi, notissimi e tuttavia consumati luoghi, costruiti dall’antichità fino ai primi decenni del Novecento: ambienti urbani flessibili, porosi e vitali che, tutta-via, ormai assolvono principalmente il ruolo di set scenografici della comunicazione contemporanea. Oggigiorno, infatti, le televisioni e, soprattutto, le piattaforme social, sono invase da migliaia di immagini fotografiche e video, quasi sempre autoprodotte attraverso gli smarthphone, che restituiscono una comunicazione orizzontale acritica, orientando la documentazione dei luoghi verso singole visioni personali e parziali. Assistiamo, insomma, a una rappresentazione ossessiva e stereotipata del paesaggio urbano, apparentemente libera e democratica ma che, invece, quasi sempre risulta fortemente influenzata dai riti contemporanei del consumo. Riti che riproducono il mondo come uno scenario per i selfie, ossia per immagini narcisiste da postare immediatamente sui social. In un certo senso, lo spazio pubblico odierno sembra però rifiutare le caratteristiche che per secoli lo hanno connotato come “il fenomeno urbano” per eccellenza, caricandosi semmai di significati, funzioni e forme tipiche delle aree ludiche, disposte su suoli naturali o artificiali. Si è trasformato, insomma, in un luogo divertente ed edonistico, dotato di caratteri che, fino a una certa data, venivano ascritti alle discipline dell’architettura dei giardini e del paesaggio: quelli dei playground e dei grandi parchi urbani pieni di attività sportive e ricreative.
The Park, a Political Space of Leisure / Lanzetta, Alessandro. - (2025), pp. 96-105.
The Park, a Political Space of Leisure
Alessandro Lanzetta
2025
Abstract
Unlike what can be observed in many countries around the world, in the imagination of the Italian ruling classes – political, intellectual, academic, and professional – urban public space still coincides with the traditional spaces of squares and streets in city centers, especially those of the so-called historic centers. In Italy, every contempo-rary event “worth its salt” still seems to have to take place in those beautiful, well-known, and yet worn-out places, built from antiquity up to the early decades of the 20th century: flexible, porous, and vital urban envi-ronments that now primarily serve as scenic sets for contemporary communication. Today, television and, especially, social platforms are flooded with thousands of photographic and video images, almost always self-produced through smartphones, providing a horizontal, uncritical communication that documents places through individual and partial visions. We witness an obsessive and stereotyped representation of the urban landscape, seemingly free and democratic but almost al-ways strongly influenced by contemporary consumption rituals. Rituals that reproduce the world as a backdrop for selfies, i.e., narcissistic images to be immediately posted on social media. The visual-consumerist enjoyment of the landscape affects both tourists and all people, young and old, who visit, stroll, or shop in the wonderful places we have inherited from the past. They experience the exhilarat-ing aesthetic experiences offered by numerous shops, bars, typical taverns, exotic restaurants, monu-ments, galleries, museums, and events of all kinds, located on the urban surface of historic centers. In a certain sense, however, today’s public space seems to reject the characteristics that have de-fined it as “the urban phenomenon” par excellence for centuries, instead taking on meanings, func-tions, and forms typical of recreational areas, laid out on natural or artificial grounds. It has trans-formed into a fun and hedonistic place, endowed with features that, until a certain point, were at-tributed to the disciplines of garden and landscape architecture: those of playgrounds and large urban parks full of sports and recreational activities.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Lanzetta_Park-political-space_2025.pdf
accesso aperto
Note: copertina, frontespizio, indice, articolo, retro di copertina
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
2.57 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.57 MB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


