This article examines the views of Carneades of Cyrene (214/3–129/8 BCE) and his followers as depicted in Cicero’s Academics. Carneades is not only known for his decision to refrain from recording his thoughts in writing but is also celebrated for his tendency to rapidly shift between different theses. This tendency is further complicated as it also seems to affect the core tenets of his “sceptical” stance. Indeed, Carneades' immediate followers offered conflicting accounts of his philosophy. Clitomachus of Carthage (187/6–110/9 BCE) regarded Carneades' philosophy as radically sceptical, contending that Carneades never granted assent to τὸ πιθανόν ("the persuasive," translated by Cicero as probabile and veri simile) nor to the notion that the σοφός (the wise person) could hold opinions and, thus, err. In contrast, Metrodorus of Stratonicea (chronology uncertain) and Philo of Larissa (159/8–84/3 BCE) maintained that Carneades did allow for these claims, thereby advocating a more moderate form of scepticism. The analysis is divided into two main parts. The first part (sections 1–2) explores the continuities and divergences between Carneades’ view and that of Arcesilaus, outlining Carneades’ key innovations. The second part (sections 3–6) contrasts interpretations of Carneades’ concept of τὸ πιθανόν, focusing on the differences among Metrodorus of Stratonicea, Philo of Larissa, and Clitomachus.

Carneades and his heirs in Cicero’s Academici libri / Rover, Chiara. - (2024).

Carneades and his heirs in Cicero’s Academici libri

Chiara Rover
2024

Abstract

This article examines the views of Carneades of Cyrene (214/3–129/8 BCE) and his followers as depicted in Cicero’s Academics. Carneades is not only known for his decision to refrain from recording his thoughts in writing but is also celebrated for his tendency to rapidly shift between different theses. This tendency is further complicated as it also seems to affect the core tenets of his “sceptical” stance. Indeed, Carneades' immediate followers offered conflicting accounts of his philosophy. Clitomachus of Carthage (187/6–110/9 BCE) regarded Carneades' philosophy as radically sceptical, contending that Carneades never granted assent to τὸ πιθανόν ("the persuasive," translated by Cicero as probabile and veri simile) nor to the notion that the σοφός (the wise person) could hold opinions and, thus, err. In contrast, Metrodorus of Stratonicea (chronology uncertain) and Philo of Larissa (159/8–84/3 BCE) maintained that Carneades did allow for these claims, thereby advocating a more moderate form of scepticism. The analysis is divided into two main parts. The first part (sections 1–2) explores the continuities and divergences between Carneades’ view and that of Arcesilaus, outlining Carneades’ key innovations. The second part (sections 3–6) contrasts interpretations of Carneades’ concept of τὸ πιθανόν, focusing on the differences among Metrodorus of Stratonicea, Philo of Larissa, and Clitomachus.
2024
Works of philosophy and their reception: Cicero, Academics
criterion of truth; akatalēpsia; inapprehensibility; incomprehensibility; skepticism; epochē; suspension of judgment; to pithanon; the persuasive
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Carneades and his heirs in Cicero’s Academici libri / Rover, Chiara. - (2024).
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Rover_Carneades-and-his-heirs_2024.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.35 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.35 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1737170
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact