The authors show that jus cogens is a divisive notion and that this mainly depends on the theoretical approach adopted. They use the recent works of the ILC to illustrate that opposing views largely correspond to diverging ways of understanding the structure of the international community. Four specific questions are addressed: 1) can a treaty create jus cogens rules? 2) does jus cogens cover substantive and structural rules of international law, 3) do international courts have jurisdiction with respect to jus cogens?, and 4) can "collective" countermeasures be adopted as a response to jus cogens violations?
Divisive jus cogens / Bonafe, Beatrice; Arcari, Maurizio. - (2024), pp. 43-54.
Divisive jus cogens
beatrice bonafe;
2024
Abstract
The authors show that jus cogens is a divisive notion and that this mainly depends on the theoretical approach adopted. They use the recent works of the ILC to illustrate that opposing views largely correspond to diverging ways of understanding the structure of the international community. Four specific questions are addressed: 1) can a treaty create jus cogens rules? 2) does jus cogens cover substantive and structural rules of international law, 3) do international courts have jurisdiction with respect to jus cogens?, and 4) can "collective" countermeasures be adopted as a response to jus cogens violations?File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bonafe_Divisive _2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
1.14 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.14 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.