The article aims to show how, in the reading of the idea of mythos proposed by Horkheimer and Adorno, a way of considering it not only as a repetition of the Same, but also as an openness to the Other is implicit. This is what witnesses, on the one hand, the relationship between the notion of “mana” and the idea of “aura” and, on the other hand, the recognition of the “inexhaustible” character that must be attributed to the conceptual figure of the “symbol”.
Auraticità del fenomeno e indeterminatezza del simbolo. Una seconda (e non-ovvia) nozione di “mito” nella "Dialettica dell’illuminismo" di M. Horkheimer e Th. W. Adorno / Valentini, Antonio. - (2024), pp. 109-120. - QUADERNI DI VILLA MIRAFIORI.
Auraticità del fenomeno e indeterminatezza del simbolo. Una seconda (e non-ovvia) nozione di “mito” nella "Dialettica dell’illuminismo" di M. Horkheimer e Th. W. Adorno
Antonio Valentini
2024
Abstract
The article aims to show how, in the reading of the idea of mythos proposed by Horkheimer and Adorno, a way of considering it not only as a repetition of the Same, but also as an openness to the Other is implicit. This is what witnesses, on the one hand, the relationship between the notion of “mana” and the idea of “aura” and, on the other hand, the recognition of the “inexhaustible” character that must be attributed to the conceptual figure of the “symbol”.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Valentini_Auraticità-del-fenomeno_2024.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
298.83 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
298.83 kB | Adobe PDF |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.