The current uses of cities and the complexity of metropolitan contexts represent the scenario in which the mobility of people and goods takes place. Consequently, mobility takes on a key role in urban and metropolitan policies in order to ensuring the functioning of cities, bringing with it issues such as social inclusion, on the one hand, and environmental quality. The Right to Mobility (Amato, 2020) represents today more than ever the standard to be guaranteed. Already in 1987, Marcello Vittorini, one of the most important Italian urban planners of the second half of the twentieth century, argued that: «…urban transport systems, properly reorganized, could represent the urban framework of any city, determining its future structure, especially where and when traffic problems require radical and urgent interventions. Within the consolidated cities, it is now possible to reasonably hypothesize a functional independence of traffic with respect to the transformation processes of the settlements, which are so full of different, integrated, and variable functions as to require in any case the maximum possible accessibility and mobility to the highest degree of capability and functionality…» (Vittorini, 1987). For these reasons, let’s start with a premise: the mobility planning is a tool for urban regeneration.
Urban Form and Sustainable Mobility. Strategies for Resilience and Anti-fragile Cities | Forma urbana e mobilità sostenibile. Strategie di resilienza e città anti-fragili / Cerasoli, Mario. - (2024), pp. 67-87.
Urban Form and Sustainable Mobility. Strategies for Resilience and Anti-fragile Cities | Forma urbana e mobilità sostenibile. Strategie di resilienza e città anti-fragili
Mario Cerasoli
2024
Abstract
The current uses of cities and the complexity of metropolitan contexts represent the scenario in which the mobility of people and goods takes place. Consequently, mobility takes on a key role in urban and metropolitan policies in order to ensuring the functioning of cities, bringing with it issues such as social inclusion, on the one hand, and environmental quality. The Right to Mobility (Amato, 2020) represents today more than ever the standard to be guaranteed. Already in 1987, Marcello Vittorini, one of the most important Italian urban planners of the second half of the twentieth century, argued that: «…urban transport systems, properly reorganized, could represent the urban framework of any city, determining its future structure, especially where and when traffic problems require radical and urgent interventions. Within the consolidated cities, it is now possible to reasonably hypothesize a functional independence of traffic with respect to the transformation processes of the settlements, which are so full of different, integrated, and variable functions as to require in any case the maximum possible accessibility and mobility to the highest degree of capability and functionality…» (Vittorini, 1987). For these reasons, let’s start with a premise: the mobility planning is a tool for urban regeneration.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cerasoli_Forma urbana_2024.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Note: full paper
Tipologia:
Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
9.91 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
9.91 MB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.