Deaf and Disability Studies since their birth built a strong descriptive theoretical framework based on a dichotomy between a medical perspective of deafness and disability and a socio-cultural one. The literature in the field has developed from the first rigid definitions of deaf community and culture (Padden & Humphries, 1988) conceived parallelly to emerging sign language linguistics, to arrive at more mature phases of deconstruction and reconstruction of theoretical models on the social object of deafness (Friedner & Kusters, 2015; Kusters et al., 2017; Leigh, 2009) influenced by the broader processes of rethinking underway in the social sciences. Ethnographic research carried in the Global South (Kusters, 2009, 2015; Kusters & Hou, 2020) shed new light on how the experience of deafness is subject to human variability. However, field research do not always led to imagine new theoretical approaches that could take into account the interactions between macro and higher institutional views of deafness and the individual varieties of experiencing (social) reality through deafness. Since appears to be, in many societies, a disconnect between the production of services for deaf people and the requests from deaf people, it seems important to investigate how the different social representations of deafness function and determine phenomena of inclusion and exclusion, access or not to knowledge, communication, information. The demands of deaf people do not seem to have an impact, or do so very slowly, on the ways in which society frames and proposes inclusion. Resulting in the theorization of inclusion models and practices that does not always meet the requests of the deaf community. This contribution will try to highlight this discrepancy. Following some recent analysis applying epistemic injustice to disability (Cupples, 2020) and deaf studies (Burke, 2022; Robinson, 2022; Scully, 2018), in a broader social representations theory frame (Manchaiah et al., 2019) this presentation will explore how seeing deaf people experience through this conceptual lens could better unveil marginalized groups dynamics on inclusion, accessibility and access to knowledge. Raising awareness in a different way on these processes could hopefully help to understand and overcome stigmatization.

I’m going to get a cochlear implant, so peace for myself. epistemic injustice and deafness / Zuccala, Amir. - (2024). (Intervento presentato al convegno Social work day 2024 "La santé mentale au cœur de l’intervention", School of Social Work, University of Ottawa tenutosi a Ottawa, Canada).

I’m going to get a cochlear implant, so peace for myself. epistemic injustice and deafness

Amir Zuccala
2024

Abstract

Deaf and Disability Studies since their birth built a strong descriptive theoretical framework based on a dichotomy between a medical perspective of deafness and disability and a socio-cultural one. The literature in the field has developed from the first rigid definitions of deaf community and culture (Padden & Humphries, 1988) conceived parallelly to emerging sign language linguistics, to arrive at more mature phases of deconstruction and reconstruction of theoretical models on the social object of deafness (Friedner & Kusters, 2015; Kusters et al., 2017; Leigh, 2009) influenced by the broader processes of rethinking underway in the social sciences. Ethnographic research carried in the Global South (Kusters, 2009, 2015; Kusters & Hou, 2020) shed new light on how the experience of deafness is subject to human variability. However, field research do not always led to imagine new theoretical approaches that could take into account the interactions between macro and higher institutional views of deafness and the individual varieties of experiencing (social) reality through deafness. Since appears to be, in many societies, a disconnect between the production of services for deaf people and the requests from deaf people, it seems important to investigate how the different social representations of deafness function and determine phenomena of inclusion and exclusion, access or not to knowledge, communication, information. The demands of deaf people do not seem to have an impact, or do so very slowly, on the ways in which society frames and proposes inclusion. Resulting in the theorization of inclusion models and practices that does not always meet the requests of the deaf community. This contribution will try to highlight this discrepancy. Following some recent analysis applying epistemic injustice to disability (Cupples, 2020) and deaf studies (Burke, 2022; Robinson, 2022; Scully, 2018), in a broader social representations theory frame (Manchaiah et al., 2019) this presentation will explore how seeing deaf people experience through this conceptual lens could better unveil marginalized groups dynamics on inclusion, accessibility and access to knowledge. Raising awareness in a different way on these processes could hopefully help to understand and overcome stigmatization.
2024
Depuis leur naissance, les études sur la surdité et le handicap ont construit un cadre théorique descriptif fort basé sur une dichotomie entre une perspective médicale de la surdité et du handicap et une perspective socioculturelle. La littérature dans ce domaine s'est développée à partir des premières définitions rigides de la communauté et de la culture des sourds (Padden & Humphries, 1988) conçues parallèlement à la linguistique émergente de la langue des signes, pour arriver à des phases plus matures de déconstruction et de reconstruction de modèles théoriques sur l'objet social de la surdité. la surdité (Friedner & Kusters, 2015 ; Kusters et al., 2017; Leigh, 2009) influencée par les processus plus larges de repensation en cours dans les sciences sociales. Les recherches ethnographiques menées dans les pays du Sud (Kusters, 2009, 2015 ; Kusters & Hou, 2020) ont apporté un nouvel éclairage sur la manière dont l’expérience de la surdité est soumise à la variabilité humaine. Cependant, les recherches sur le terrain n’ont pas toujours permis d’imaginer de nouvelles approches théoriques. Suite à des analyses récentes appliquant l’injustice épistémique au handicap (Cupples, 2020) et à des études sur les sourds (Burke, 2022 ; Robinson, 2022 ; Scully, 2018), dans un cadre plus large de théorie des représentations sociales (Manchaiah et al., 2019), cette présentation explorera comment voir l'expérience des personnes sourdes à travers cette lentille conceptuelle pourrait mieux dévoiler la dynamique des groupes marginalisés en matière d'inclusion, d'accessibilité et d'accès à la connaissance. Nous espérons qu’une sensibilisation différente à ces processus pourrait aider à comprendre et à surmonter la stigmatisation.
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1706547
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact