Traditional nonparametric frontier models used to asses technical, allocative, cost, and scale efficiencies, based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), reflect not only the most favorable way of weighing outputs over inputs but also tradeoffs of compensations among the many production possibilities. When managers or policy makers have an explicit preference over some production resources or products, such tradeoffs and the resulting estimated efficiency measure may not represent the most appropriate scenario of evaluation. The good performance of some decision units on some production variables may offset the bad performance on others, and this may be sufficient to qualify such decision units as efficient (or less inefficient) in most DEA rankings, but not under the subjective perspective of the decision maker. This is particularly important in the case of non-discretionary inputs, bad outputs, or less desirable production configurations. In this chapter, we discuss this issue offering a perspective on how we can advance in this avenue by developing multicriteria non-compensatory directions for the expansion of outputs or contraction of inputs. A numerical example is reported at the end of this discussion. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Combining Directional Distances and ELECTRE Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Preferable Assessments of Efficiency / Nepomuceno, T. C. C.; Daraio, C.. - (2023), pp. 81-92. - LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS. [10.1007/978-3-031-29583-6_5].

Combining Directional Distances and ELECTRE Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Preferable Assessments of Efficiency

Daraio C.
2023

Abstract

Traditional nonparametric frontier models used to asses technical, allocative, cost, and scale efficiencies, based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), reflect not only the most favorable way of weighing outputs over inputs but also tradeoffs of compensations among the many production possibilities. When managers or policy makers have an explicit preference over some production resources or products, such tradeoffs and the resulting estimated efficiency measure may not represent the most appropriate scenario of evaluation. The good performance of some decision units on some production variables may offset the bad performance on others, and this may be sufficient to qualify such decision units as efficient (or less inefficient) in most DEA rankings, but not under the subjective perspective of the decision maker. This is particularly important in the case of non-discretionary inputs, bad outputs, or less desirable production configurations. In this chapter, we discuss this issue offering a perspective on how we can advance in this avenue by developing multicriteria non-compensatory directions for the expansion of outputs or contraction of inputs. A numerical example is reported at the end of this discussion. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
2023
Advanced Mathematical Methods for Economic Efficiency Analysis. Theory and Empirical Applications
978-3-031-29582-9
978-3-031-29583-6
Efficiency; productivity; directional distances, multicriteria methods
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Combining Directional Distances and ELECTRE Multicriteria Decision Analysis for Preferable Assessments of Efficiency / Nepomuceno, T. C. C.; Daraio, C.. - (2023), pp. 81-92. - LECTURE NOTES IN ECONOMICS AND MATHEMATICAL SYSTEMS. [10.1007/978-3-031-29583-6_5].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Nepomuceno_Combining-Directional_2023.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 3.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.43 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1695446
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact