The present study aims to evaluate the accessibility of infographics by using the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, as well as to underline the necessity of new curricula on infographic literacy. The study was conducted on a sample of 200 participants [100 Visual Designer Graduate – 100 Other Disciplines Graduated]. The participants were given a set of infographics to evaluate based on their usability and understandability. The results showed that there were signifi-cant differences in the scores based on the level of education of the participants, with higher design education levels leading to better scores. The study also high-lighted the importance of developing new curricula on infographic literacy, as the current educational system does not provide enough opportunities for students to learn about infographics and their proper use. This is especially important given the increasing prevalence of infographics in various fields, from journalism to science communication. Without proper education on infographic literacy, indi-viduals may struggle to fully understand and utilize the information presented in infographics, leading to potential misinterpretations or misunderstandings. The findings of this study have important implications for educators and practitioners alike. Educators should prioritize the development of new curricula on infographic literacy to better prepare students for the increasing prevalence of infographics in various fields. Practitioners, on the other hand, should strive to make their info-graphics more accessible and user-friendly, especially for individuals with lower educational backgrounds.

How We Evaluate the Accessibility of an Infographic: A Pilot Study Through SUS Questionnaire / Caccamo, Alessio. - (2023), pp. 229-247. - LECTURE NOTES IN BUSINESS INFORMATION PROCESSING. [10.1007/978-3-031-43088-6_12].

How We Evaluate the Accessibility of an Infographic: A Pilot Study Through SUS Questionnaire

Alessio Caccamo
Primo
2023

Abstract

The present study aims to evaluate the accessibility of infographics by using the System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaire, as well as to underline the necessity of new curricula on infographic literacy. The study was conducted on a sample of 200 participants [100 Visual Designer Graduate – 100 Other Disciplines Graduated]. The participants were given a set of infographics to evaluate based on their usability and understandability. The results showed that there were signifi-cant differences in the scores based on the level of education of the participants, with higher design education levels leading to better scores. The study also high-lighted the importance of developing new curricula on infographic literacy, as the current educational system does not provide enough opportunities for students to learn about infographics and their proper use. This is especially important given the increasing prevalence of infographics in various fields, from journalism to science communication. Without proper education on infographic literacy, indi-viduals may struggle to fully understand and utilize the information presented in infographics, leading to potential misinterpretations or misunderstandings. The findings of this study have important implications for educators and practitioners alike. Educators should prioritize the development of new curricula on infographic literacy to better prepare students for the increasing prevalence of infographics in various fields. Practitioners, on the other hand, should strive to make their info-graphics more accessible and user-friendly, especially for individuals with lower educational backgrounds.
2023
Web Information Systems and Technologies. WEBIST 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 494
978-3-031-43087-9
978-3-031-43088-6
information design; evaluation; graphicacy; accessibility
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
How We Evaluate the Accessibility of an Infographic: A Pilot Study Through SUS Questionnaire / Caccamo, Alessio. - (2023), pp. 229-247. - LECTURE NOTES IN BUSINESS INFORMATION PROCESSING. [10.1007/978-3-031-43088-6_12].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Caccamo_How We Evaluate_2023.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 929.68 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
929.68 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1686894
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact