Queen Min (1851-1895) is described in numerous texts including diaries and newspaper articles written by Western, Japanese and Korean authors who lived in Korea between the late 19th and early 20th centuries. However, she is without visual identity, i.e., facial identity, even though King Kojong (1864-1907) referred to the existence of a portrait. This article holds that visual and non-visual identities are complementary to a person. It argues that in the case of Queen Min, the missing visual record generates a de-personification of her identity and that this contributes to the tarnishing of her public and private role in the period prior to Japan’s annexation of Korea. The paper also discusses the history of the queen’s visual identity, which is missing from official history, and inquires into its significance.
"The Conundrum of Queen Min’s Portrait: a Denied or Partial Identity?", ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; 25 March 2022 / Bruno, Antonetta L.; Kim, Kukjin. - (2022). (Intervento presentato al convegno Special Lecture: "The Conundrum of Queen Min’s Portrait:a Denied or Partial Identity?" tenutosi a Venice; Italy).
"The Conundrum of Queen Min’s Portrait: a Denied or Partial Identity?", ca’ Foscari University of Venice, Italy; 25 March 2022
Antonetta L. BrunoWriting – Original Draft Preparation
;Kukjin Kim
Membro del Collaboration Group
2022
Abstract
Queen Min (1851-1895) is described in numerous texts including diaries and newspaper articles written by Western, Japanese and Korean authors who lived in Korea between the late 19th and early 20th centuries. However, she is without visual identity, i.e., facial identity, even though King Kojong (1864-1907) referred to the existence of a portrait. This article holds that visual and non-visual identities are complementary to a person. It argues that in the case of Queen Min, the missing visual record generates a de-personification of her identity and that this contributes to the tarnishing of her public and private role in the period prior to Japan’s annexation of Korea. The paper also discusses the history of the queen’s visual identity, which is missing from official history, and inquires into its significance.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.