The problem of defining the limits to the application of national procedural rules lies at the root of both the strands of case law of the Court of Justice of the EU regarding, respectively, EU competition law enforcement through arbitration and antitrust damages actions. Therefore, these two lines of private enforcement of competition law are characterized by the interplay of national procedural rules – which, as far as arbitration is concerned, define the attitude of the national legal order towards this ‘private dispute settlement system’(see Case C-126/97 Eco Swiss [1999]) – and the need for the uniform application of EU competition law. National judges have to juggle these two different – and often contrasting – forces, while arbitrators have to take due account of EU competition law in order to render awards which are likely to encounter no difficulties in the context of a possible review before national judges, without having the possibility to resort to the preliminary ruling procedure (Case 102/81 Nordsee [1982]). This legal framework governs the relationship between public and private enforcement when EU competition law issues are at stake in a dispute to be settled by an arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal. This framework has implications with regard to the arbitrability of EU competition law issues and to the duties of arbitrators called on to settle disputes where such issues may arise.

Some Considerations on Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes and Powers and Duties of Arbitrators in Applying EU Competition Law / Cisotta, R. - (2015), pp. 243-260.

Some Considerations on Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes and Powers and Duties of Arbitrators in Applying EU Competition Law

Cisotta R
2015

Abstract

The problem of defining the limits to the application of national procedural rules lies at the root of both the strands of case law of the Court of Justice of the EU regarding, respectively, EU competition law enforcement through arbitration and antitrust damages actions. Therefore, these two lines of private enforcement of competition law are characterized by the interplay of national procedural rules – which, as far as arbitration is concerned, define the attitude of the national legal order towards this ‘private dispute settlement system’(see Case C-126/97 Eco Swiss [1999]) – and the need for the uniform application of EU competition law. National judges have to juggle these two different – and often contrasting – forces, while arbitrators have to take due account of EU competition law in order to render awards which are likely to encounter no difficulties in the context of a possible review before national judges, without having the possibility to resort to the preliminary ruling procedure (Case 102/81 Nordsee [1982]). This legal framework governs the relationship between public and private enforcement when EU competition law issues are at stake in a dispute to be settled by an arbitrator or an arbitral tribunal. This framework has implications with regard to the arbitrability of EU competition law issues and to the duties of arbitrators called on to settle disputes where such issues may arise.
2015
Litigation and Arbitration in EU Competition Law
9781783478859
competition law; arbitration; preliminary ruling
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Some Considerations on Arbitrability of Competition Law Disputes and Powers and Duties of Arbitrators in Applying EU Competition Law / Cisotta, R. - (2015), pp. 243-260.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Cisotta_Some_considerations_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 4.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.31 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1585785
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact