Lingvoekologia i gosudarstvennaya sluzhba

Otechestvennoi istorii izvestny primery zloupotrebleniia obstsennoi leksikoi pri osushchestvlenii deiatelnosti po gosudarstvennomu upravleniiu. Leksicheskie konstruktsii, soderzhashchie takie komponenty, periodicheski, okazyvaiutsia i segodnia ispolzuemymi v rechi gosudarstvennykh sluzhashchikh. Primenenie polozhenii lingvoekologii mozhet vnesti nekotoruiu opredelennost v protseduru otsenki stepeni dopustimosti takoi iazykovoi praktiki. V podobnoi situatsii predlagaetsia chetko razlichat sluchai oskorblenii, sovershennykh dolzhnostnym litsom, ot obychnoi praktiki ispolzovaniia obstsennoi leksiki. Zdes aktualnym iavliaetsia i vnesenie opredelennosti v ponimanie smysla (soderzhaniia) kategorii (poniatiia) “obshchestvennoe mesto”.

Domestic history is known for examples of abuse of obscene vocabulary in public administration activities. Lexical constructions containing such components periodically turn out to be used today in the speech of public servants. The application of the provisions of linguoecology may introduce some certainty into the procedure for assessing the degree of admissibility of such language practice. In such a situation, it is proposed to clearly distinguish cases of abuse committed by an official from the usual practice of using obscene language. Here, the introduction of certainty into the understanding of the meaning (content) of the category (concept) of “public place” is also relevant.