The product examines the legal issues concerning the Kadi judgment, where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) overruled the judgments of the Court of First Instance (CFI) in the cases Kadi and Yusuf and annulled Council Regulation 881/2002—which had imposed restrictive measures against persons and entities associated with Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network, and the Taliban—because it found a breach of fundamental rights of the European Union (EU). The case is special due to the adoption of the annulled regulation by the Council of the EU pursuant to resolutions of the UN Security Council. It is considered that, even though the ECJ emphasized that it had no authority to call into question the lawfulness of UN Security Council resolutions, this judgment leaves a wide range of interpretations regarding the interplay between international law and EU law. The product envisages that the EC (now EU) can be envisaged as a third State in the sense of the Charter of the United Nations with all the legal consequences attached to.
Il lavoro esamina la questione della rilevanza diretta delle decisioni del Consiglio di sicurezza nel sistema giuridico dell’Unione europea, sostenendo, in particolare, la tesi che tale rilevanza vada dedotta, in particolare, dall’art. 2, par. 6 della Carta dell’ONU, da ritenersi applicabile alle organizzazioni internazionali, che, come l’UE, operano nel campo del mantenimento della pace e della sicurezza internazionale.
Il primato della Carta e la Comunità europea / Marchisio, Sergio. - (2010), pp. 87-104.
Il primato della Carta e la Comunità europea
MARCHISIO, Sergio
2010
Abstract
The product examines the legal issues concerning the Kadi judgment, where the European Court of Justice (ECJ) overruled the judgments of the Court of First Instance (CFI) in the cases Kadi and Yusuf and annulled Council Regulation 881/2002—which had imposed restrictive measures against persons and entities associated with Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network, and the Taliban—because it found a breach of fundamental rights of the European Union (EU). The case is special due to the adoption of the annulled regulation by the Council of the EU pursuant to resolutions of the UN Security Council. It is considered that, even though the ECJ emphasized that it had no authority to call into question the lawfulness of UN Security Council resolutions, this judgment leaves a wide range of interpretations regarding the interplay between international law and EU law. The product envisages that the EC (now EU) can be envisaged as a third State in the sense of the Charter of the United Nations with all the legal consequences attached to.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.