This paper maintains that Heidegger’s thought offers a good theoretical basis for a productive comparison between science and philosophy. After examining the ‘consubstantiality’ between philosophy and science, which emerges in the (only recently published) first part of the conference “Phenomenology and Theology”, the hypothesis will be tested that philosophy is the «ontological corrective» of physics. The idea of (physical) time as an illusion, developed by the theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, appears to be perfectly (and maybe only) understandable in the Heideggerian framework.
Between physics and philosophy: Heidegger philosopher of science / Bancalari, Stefano. - (2021), pp. 253-269. [10.1007/978-3-030-56566-4_15].
Between physics and philosophy: Heidegger philosopher of science
Stefano Bancalari
2021
Abstract
This paper maintains that Heidegger’s thought offers a good theoretical basis for a productive comparison between science and philosophy. After examining the ‘consubstantiality’ between philosophy and science, which emerges in the (only recently published) first part of the conference “Phenomenology and Theology”, the hypothesis will be tested that philosophy is the «ontological corrective» of physics. The idea of (physical) time as an illusion, developed by the theoretical physicist Carlo Rovelli, appears to be perfectly (and maybe only) understandable in the Heideggerian framework.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Bancalari_Between-physics_2021pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
393.15 kB
Formato
Unknown
|
393.15 kB | Unknown | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.