In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.
Methodological Comparison of Different Projects / Salvatori, Livia Maria; Marceca, Maurizio; Paglione, Lorenzo; Angelozzi, Aurora; Caminada, Susanna; Errigo, Miriam; Tofani, Marco; Battisti, Alessandra; Barnocchi, Asia; Bodini, Chiara; Riccio, Martina; Maralla, Rita; Gentilini, Valeria; Cacciatore, Francesca; Trusiani, Elio; D’Onofrio, Rosalba; Grifoni, Roberta Cocci; Pierantozzi, Mariano; Petrucci, Enrica; Odoguardi, Ilaria; Marchesani, Graziano Enzo; Sgrò, Corrado; Camaioni, Chiara; Sangiorgi, Daniela; Lucchi, Fabio; Carrera, Marta; Paoletti, Flavio; Greco, Alessandro Dario; Iorio, Silvia. - (2020), pp. 225-260. - GREEN ENERGY AND TECHNOLOGY. [10.1007/978-3-030-49446-9_16].
Methodological Comparison of Different Projects
Salvatori, Livia Maria;Marceca, Maurizio;Paglione, Lorenzo;Angelozzi, Aurora;Caminada, Susanna;Tofani, Marco;Battisti, Alessandra;Barnocchi, Asia;Trusiani, Elio;Camaioni, Chiara;Lucchi, Fabio;Iorio, Silvia
2020
Abstract
In order to compare the methodological aspects of the different projects, while also placing them within a common framework, a form was specially drafted. This form was filled out in May 2019 by one or more members of each work group (Ascoli Piceno, Bologna, Milano, Roma, Trieste). The form was divided into three different sections (“Context characterisation methods”; “Community involvement methods”; “Networking methods”). Each section was created in order to highlight multidisciplinary aspects, the collaboration among different roles, and the problems and limitations the could have been faced. The sections differ in their design, although a common scheme was used in nearly all parts: narrative description, players, actions, instruments and sources. Consequently, all projects were therefore analysed according to the following matrix. Considering the specificity of the Recovery-Net project, this project was analysed solely for context characterisation methods.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Salvatori_Methodological_2020.pdf
solo gestori archivio
Tipologia:
Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza:
Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione
238.81 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
238.81 kB | Adobe PDF | Contatta l'autore |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.