The formation process of public spaces within the modern city has ancient origins: although generally referenced to the model of the great public spaces of Republican and imperial Rome (forum), the “common” urban space of Italian cities bears a different juridical nature from that of the “public” space of the imperial Rome. The latter was fenced and equipped with gates, it was a personal property of the imperial family, with access governed in time and dedicated to the worship of the imperial family and its tutelary deities. This urban space was therefore not “public” in the sense we understand today. The “common” space (squares) of the Italian cities came into being in the Middle Ages hence the deliberate action of the free “Communes” that decided it to build by subtraction, demolishing residential blocks as in Florence – of factional losers in the struggle for power. It became a space for free civic aggregation, for the meeting and the election of the council and the podestà. There are some earlier squares next to the cathedrals, where meetings where necessary for the election of the archbishop since the tenth century, but the “common” space acquires its complete form and its civic role only since the thirteenth century with the more mature phase of the municipal experience. In these squares, bishopric, municipal (and later ducal and lordly), we can recognize the presence of a market place: the “common space” here takes on the double meaning of place for business and place for civic meetings. This manner of designing public spaces consolidates in the following centuries with several cases in mannerist age and beyond. The birth of the modern theater stood initially in these spaces through wooden stalls mounted temporarily, before knotting in the form of a closed theater building (Strappa, 1995). The design of the public spaces within the city used specific design skills to shape the urban voids in a “theatrical” manner. In parallel with the rise of the bourgeois mansion (Palazzo) and the recast and aggregation of basic building types, often adjacent to the palazzo, an empty space arises assuming the character of a “building without roof”.

The formation process of public space: from urban fabric to palaces and squares / Camiz, A.. - (2018), pp. 204-215.

The formation process of public space: from urban fabric to palaces and squares

A. Camiz
Primo
Methodology
2018

Abstract

The formation process of public spaces within the modern city has ancient origins: although generally referenced to the model of the great public spaces of Republican and imperial Rome (forum), the “common” urban space of Italian cities bears a different juridical nature from that of the “public” space of the imperial Rome. The latter was fenced and equipped with gates, it was a personal property of the imperial family, with access governed in time and dedicated to the worship of the imperial family and its tutelary deities. This urban space was therefore not “public” in the sense we understand today. The “common” space (squares) of the Italian cities came into being in the Middle Ages hence the deliberate action of the free “Communes” that decided it to build by subtraction, demolishing residential blocks as in Florence – of factional losers in the struggle for power. It became a space for free civic aggregation, for the meeting and the election of the council and the podestà. There are some earlier squares next to the cathedrals, where meetings where necessary for the election of the archbishop since the tenth century, but the “common” space acquires its complete form and its civic role only since the thirteenth century with the more mature phase of the municipal experience. In these squares, bishopric, municipal (and later ducal and lordly), we can recognize the presence of a market place: the “common space” here takes on the double meaning of place for business and place for civic meetings. This manner of designing public spaces consolidates in the following centuries with several cases in mannerist age and beyond. The birth of the modern theater stood initially in these spaces through wooden stalls mounted temporarily, before knotting in the form of a closed theater building (Strappa, 1995). The design of the public spaces within the city used specific design skills to shape the urban voids in a “theatrical” manner. In parallel with the rise of the bourgeois mansion (Palazzo) and the recast and aggregation of basic building types, often adjacent to the palazzo, an empty space arises assuming the character of a “building without roof”.
2018
Learning from Rome. Historical cities and Contemporary design
9788894118834.
Architectural Design; urban morphology, Urban Design; Public spaces
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
The formation process of public space: from urban fabric to palaces and squares / Camiz, A.. - (2018), pp. 204-215.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Camiz_squares-isufitaly_2018.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Note: DiAP Dipartimento di Architettura e Progetto https://web.uniroma1.it/dip_diap/ U+D urbanform and design online journal http://www.urbanform.it/ lpa Laboratorio di Lettura e Progetto dell’Architettura via A. Gramsci, 53 https://web.uniroma1.it/lpa/ DRACo Dottorato di Ricerca in Architettura e Costruzione via A. Gramsci, 53 https://web.uniroma1.it/dottoratodraco/
Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.43 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.43 MB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1316293
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact