The chapter attempts to demonstrate that regional human rights instruments oriented to cultural relativism do not allow African and Asian States to derogate from the ‘universal’ obligations on freedom of religion enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to the extent that they are parties thereto. It is true that a comparison between the ICCPR, on the one hand, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, the Arab Charter on Human Rights and the ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights, on the other hand, shows some weaknesses in the protection of religious freedom according to the latter. Nonetheless, leaving aside non-binding instruments like the ASEAN Declaration, some of the emerging weaknesses are due to differences that may be overcome by interpretation. As to the differences giving rise to normative conflicts or incompatibilities, African and Asian States are either expected to primarily apply the ICCPR by virtue of the conflict clauses established in the regional treaties, or in any event responsible for a breach of the ICCPR although their conduct is consistent with the regional treaties.

Prefazione / Papa, Maria Irene; Pascale, Giuseppe; Gervasi, Mario. - (2019), pp. 13-14. - PUBBLICAZIONI DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA.

Prefazione

Papa, Maria Irene
;
PASCALE, GIUSEPPE
;
Gervasi Mario
2019

Abstract

The chapter attempts to demonstrate that regional human rights instruments oriented to cultural relativism do not allow African and Asian States to derogate from the ‘universal’ obligations on freedom of religion enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to the extent that they are parties thereto. It is true that a comparison between the ICCPR, on the one hand, and the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the African Charter on the Rights and Welfare of the Child, the Arab Charter on Human Rights and the ASEAN Declaration on Human Rights, on the other hand, shows some weaknesses in the protection of religious freedom according to the latter. Nonetheless, leaving aside non-binding instruments like the ASEAN Declaration, some of the emerging weaknesses are due to differences that may be overcome by interpretation. As to the differences giving rise to normative conflicts or incompatibilities, African and Asian States are either expected to primarily apply the ICCPR by virtue of the conflict clauses established in the regional treaties, or in any event responsible for a breach of the ICCPR although their conduct is consistent with the regional treaties.
2019
La tutela internazionale della libertà religiosa. Problemi e prospettive
978-88-243-2602-5
libertà religiosa; Africa; Asia; universalismo; relativismo culturale
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02c Prefazione/Postfazione
Prefazione / Papa, Maria Irene; Pascale, Giuseppe; Gervasi, Mario. - (2019), pp. 13-14. - PUBBLICAZIONI DEL DIPARTIMENTO DI SCIENZE GIURIDICHE, UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI ROMA LA SAPIENZA.
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Gervasi_Prefazione_2019.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 108.28 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
108.28 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1281582
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact