In order to avoid the drawbacks of sample size determination procedures based on classical power analysis, it is possible to define analogous criteria based on ‘hybrid classical-Bayesian’ or ‘fully Bayesian’ approaches. We review these conditional and predictive procedures and provide an application, when the focus is on a binomial model and the analysis is performed through exact methods. The distinction between analysis and design prior distributions is essential for the practical implementation of the criteria: some guidelines for choosing these priors are discussed, and their impact on the required sample size is examined.

Bayesian vs Frequentist Power Functions to Determine the Optimal Sample Size: Testing One Sample Binomial Proportion Using Exact Methods / Sambucini, Valeria. - Chapter n.5(2017), pp. 77-95. [10.5772/intechopen.70168].

Bayesian vs Frequentist Power Functions to Determine the Optimal Sample Size: Testing One Sample Binomial Proportion Using Exact Methods

Valeria Sambucini
2017

Abstract

In order to avoid the drawbacks of sample size determination procedures based on classical power analysis, it is possible to define analogous criteria based on ‘hybrid classical-Bayesian’ or ‘fully Bayesian’ approaches. We review these conditional and predictive procedures and provide an application, when the focus is on a binomial model and the analysis is performed through exact methods. The distinction between analysis and design prior distributions is essential for the practical implementation of the criteria: some guidelines for choosing these priors are discussed, and their impact on the required sample size is examined.
2017
Bayesian Inference
978-953-51-3578-4
analysis and design prior distributions; binomial proportion; bayesian power functions; conditional and predictive approach; sample size determination; saw-toothed behaviour of power
02 Pubblicazione su volume::02a Capitolo o Articolo
Bayesian vs Frequentist Power Functions to Determine the Optimal Sample Size: Testing One Sample Binomial Proportion Using Exact Methods / Sambucini, Valeria. - Chapter n.5(2017), pp. 77-95. [10.5772/intechopen.70168].
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Sambucini_Bayesian-vs-Frequentist_2017.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Post-print (versione successiva alla peer review e accettata per la pubblicazione)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 1.77 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.77 MB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/1074986
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact