In a sample of 567 loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from the central Mediterranean, debris occurrence varied according to methods and turtle source, and was up to 80% in pelagic turtles. Frequencies of plastic types, size and color are also reported. These results and a critical review of 49 studies worldwide indicate that: (i) the detected occurrence of plastic (% turtles) is affected by several factors (e.g., necropsy/feces, ecological zone, type and date of finding, captivity period for feces collection), (ii) mixed dataset and opportunistic approaches provide results which are biased , not comparable, and ultimately of questionable value, (iii) only turtles assumed to have had a normal feeding behaviour at the time of capture or death should be considered, (iv) turtle foraging ecology and possible selectivity may undermine the use of turtles as indicator species for monitoring marine litter, as recently proposed for the Mediterranean.

Biases and best approaches for assessing debris ingestion in sea turtles, with a case study in the Mediterranean / Casale, Paolo; Freggi, Daniela; Paduano, Valentina; Oliverio, Marco. - In: MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN. - ISSN 0025-326X. - STAMPA. - 110:1(2016), pp. 238-249. [10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.057]

Biases and best approaches for assessing debris ingestion in sea turtles, with a case study in the Mediterranean

Oliverio, Marco
2016

Abstract

In a sample of 567 loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) from the central Mediterranean, debris occurrence varied according to methods and turtle source, and was up to 80% in pelagic turtles. Frequencies of plastic types, size and color are also reported. These results and a critical review of 49 studies worldwide indicate that: (i) the detected occurrence of plastic (% turtles) is affected by several factors (e.g., necropsy/feces, ecological zone, type and date of finding, captivity period for feces collection), (ii) mixed dataset and opportunistic approaches provide results which are biased , not comparable, and ultimately of questionable value, (iii) only turtles assumed to have had a normal feeding behaviour at the time of capture or death should be considered, (iv) turtle foraging ecology and possible selectivity may undermine the use of turtles as indicator species for monitoring marine litter, as recently proposed for the Mediterranean.
2016
anthropogenic debris; caretta caretta; loggerhead turtle; plastic; oceanography; aquatic science; pollution
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Biases and best approaches for assessing debris ingestion in sea turtles, with a case study in the Mediterranean / Casale, Paolo; Freggi, Daniela; Paduano, Valentina; Oliverio, Marco. - In: MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN. - ISSN 0025-326X. - STAMPA. - 110:1(2016), pp. 238-249. [10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.057]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Casale_Biases_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 719.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
719.24 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore
Casale_Biases_2016.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 719.24 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
719.24 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/927416
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 64
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 51
social impact