In this study, we examined the effect of multiple versus single stimulus presentation in typically devel- oping readers and children with developmental dyslexia. The tasks involved either reading single words or arrays of words or naming single or multiple colors and digits (rapid automatized nam- ing or RAN). To be able to compare these sets of conditions, we recorded total response times (i.e., the time between stimulus onset and the end of the participant’s vocal response) in all cases. The study included 43 typically developing readers and 25 children with dyslexia. Results indicate that typically developing readers have a clear advantage with multiple over single items on both RAN and reading tasks. The children with dyslexia showed a moderate advantage for multiple stimuli in naming colors and digits but presented the opposite pattern in reading. With regard to reading, the disproportionate impairment of the children with dyslexia in dealing with multiple arrays suggests difficulty in integrating the multiple subcomponents of the reading task over and above the basic nuclear deficit in decoding words. Regarding the RAN tasks, results confirm that the requirement of integrating multiple subcomponents may be critical in mediating the predictive value of these measures on reading.

Multiple stimulus presentation yields larger deficits in children with developmental dyslexia: a study with reading and RAN-type tasks / Zoccolotti, Pierluigi; Maria De, Luca; Laura, Lami; Claudia, Pizzoli; Maria, Pontillo; Spinelli, Donatella. - In: CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1744-4136. - STAMPA. - 19:(2013), pp. 639-647. [10.1080/09297049.2012.718325]

Multiple stimulus presentation yields larger deficits in children with developmental dyslexia: a study with reading and RAN-type tasks

ZOCCOLOTTI, Pierluigi;SPINELLI, Donatella
2013

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effect of multiple versus single stimulus presentation in typically devel- oping readers and children with developmental dyslexia. The tasks involved either reading single words or arrays of words or naming single or multiple colors and digits (rapid automatized nam- ing or RAN). To be able to compare these sets of conditions, we recorded total response times (i.e., the time between stimulus onset and the end of the participant’s vocal response) in all cases. The study included 43 typically developing readers and 25 children with dyslexia. Results indicate that typically developing readers have a clear advantage with multiple over single items on both RAN and reading tasks. The children with dyslexia showed a moderate advantage for multiple stimuli in naming colors and digits but presented the opposite pattern in reading. With regard to reading, the disproportionate impairment of the children with dyslexia in dealing with multiple arrays suggests difficulty in integrating the multiple subcomponents of the reading task over and above the basic nuclear deficit in decoding words. Regarding the RAN tasks, results confirm that the requirement of integrating multiple subcomponents may be critical in mediating the predictive value of these measures on reading.
2013
reading; ran; developmental dyslexia
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Multiple stimulus presentation yields larger deficits in children with developmental dyslexia: a study with reading and RAN-type tasks / Zoccolotti, Pierluigi; Maria De, Luca; Laura, Lami; Claudia, Pizzoli; Maria, Pontillo; Spinelli, Donatella. - In: CHILD NEUROPSYCHOLOGY. - ISSN 1744-4136. - STAMPA. - 19:(2013), pp. 639-647. [10.1080/09297049.2012.718325]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/717861
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 14
  • Scopus 44
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact