It is widely accepted that axially loaded FRP confined concrete presents significant strength and ductility increase with reference to the unconfined case. Adequate FRP confinement provides bilinear – like and hardening stress–strain behavior to concrete up to failure. Therefore, to model the mechanical behavior of adequately confined concrete two quantities are necessary: peak strength and ultimate strain. Many studies have been published regarding confinement of circular section elements; fewer studies analyze the case of square and rectangular section. Numerous predictive expressions of peak strength and ultimate strain, suitable for circular section elements, are available. Only in recent years, complete equations have been proposed to cover both circular and square sections. The aim of this work is the assessment of the performances of significant predictive expressions published in literature. Four groups of predictive expressions have been considered; they differ by the type of the predictive quantity (peak strength or ultimate strain) and by their applicability (only circular sections or both circular and square sections). For this reason a wide database has been assembled; it collects results of more than 655 compressive tests, performed on square and circular specimens confined with FRP. This comparison has been diversified as a function of cross section shape and FRP type (CFRP, GFRP, AFRP).

Peak strength and ultimate strain prediction for FRP confined square and circular concrete sections / Nistico', Nicola; Pallini, F.; Rousakis, T.; Wu, Yu; Karabinis, A.. - In: COMPOSITES. PART B, ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1359-8368. - STAMPA. - 67:(2014), pp. 543-554. [10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.026]

Peak strength and ultimate strain prediction for FRP confined square and circular concrete sections

NISTICO', Nicola;
2014

Abstract

It is widely accepted that axially loaded FRP confined concrete presents significant strength and ductility increase with reference to the unconfined case. Adequate FRP confinement provides bilinear – like and hardening stress–strain behavior to concrete up to failure. Therefore, to model the mechanical behavior of adequately confined concrete two quantities are necessary: peak strength and ultimate strain. Many studies have been published regarding confinement of circular section elements; fewer studies analyze the case of square and rectangular section. Numerous predictive expressions of peak strength and ultimate strain, suitable for circular section elements, are available. Only in recent years, complete equations have been proposed to cover both circular and square sections. The aim of this work is the assessment of the performances of significant predictive expressions published in literature. Four groups of predictive expressions have been considered; they differ by the type of the predictive quantity (peak strength or ultimate strain) and by their applicability (only circular sections or both circular and square sections). For this reason a wide database has been assembled; it collects results of more than 655 compressive tests, performed on square and circular specimens confined with FRP. This comparison has been diversified as a function of cross section shape and FRP type (CFRP, GFRP, AFRP).
2014
Polymer–matrix composites (PMCs), Mechanical properties, Strength, Analytical modeling, Compression tests database
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Peak strength and ultimate strain prediction for FRP confined square and circular concrete sections / Nistico', Nicola; Pallini, F.; Rousakis, T.; Wu, Yu; Karabinis, A.. - In: COMPOSITES. PART B, ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1359-8368. - STAMPA. - 67:(2014), pp. 543-554. [10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.07.026]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/645391
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 85
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 76
social impact