The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is currently discussing the development of a Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) that would mirror the categories and criteria used to assess the conservation status of species. The suggested scientific foundations for the RLE are being considered by IUCN for adoption as the backbone of the RLE. We identify conceptual and operational weaknesses in the draft RLE approach, the categories, and criteria.While species are relatively well-described units, there is no consistent means to classify ecosystems for assessing conservation status. The proposed RLE is framed mostly around certain features of ecosystems such as broad vegetation or habitat types, and do not consider major global change drivers such as climate change. We discuss technical difficulties with the proposed concept of ecosystem collapse and suggest it is not analogous to species extinction. We highlight the lack of scientific basis for the criteria and thresholds proposed by the RLE, and question the need to adopt the structure of the Red List of Species for an RLE. We suggest that the proposed RLE is open to ambiguous interpretations and uncertain outcomes, and that its practicality and benefit for conservation should be carefully evaluated before final approval.

Challenging the Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems / Boitani, Luigi; Mace, Georgina M.; Rondinini, Carlo. - In: CONSERVATION LETTERS. - ISSN 1755-263X. - STAMPA. - 8:2(2015), pp. 125-131. [10.1111/conl.12111]

Challenging the Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems

BOITANI, Luigi;RONDININI, CARLO
2015

Abstract

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) is currently discussing the development of a Red List of Ecosystems (RLE) that would mirror the categories and criteria used to assess the conservation status of species. The suggested scientific foundations for the RLE are being considered by IUCN for adoption as the backbone of the RLE. We identify conceptual and operational weaknesses in the draft RLE approach, the categories, and criteria.While species are relatively well-described units, there is no consistent means to classify ecosystems for assessing conservation status. The proposed RLE is framed mostly around certain features of ecosystems such as broad vegetation or habitat types, and do not consider major global change drivers such as climate change. We discuss technical difficulties with the proposed concept of ecosystem collapse and suggest it is not analogous to species extinction. We highlight the lack of scientific basis for the criteria and thresholds proposed by the RLE, and question the need to adopt the structure of the Red List of Species for an RLE. We suggest that the proposed RLE is open to ambiguous interpretations and uncertain outcomes, and that its practicality and benefit for conservation should be carefully evaluated before final approval.
2015
Biodiversity assessment; conservation status; criteria; ecosystem assessment; ecosystem collapse; threshold
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Challenging the Scientific Foundations for an IUCN Red List of Ecosystems / Boitani, Luigi; Mace, Georgina M.; Rondinini, Carlo. - In: CONSERVATION LETTERS. - ISSN 1755-263X. - STAMPA. - 8:2(2015), pp. 125-131. [10.1111/conl.12111]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Boitani_Challenging_2015.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 114.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
114.16 kB Adobe PDF

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/624610
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 42
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact