The aim of the paper is to offer a systemic overview about some critical and interdependent relations among carbon offset, carbon sequestration and carbon stock. Rooting in the complexity perspective, the work discusses some relevant measurement methods and financial issues related to the Land Use - Land Use Change Forestry (LULUCF) applied under Kyoto Protocol rules. The carbon sinks could contribute to the sequestration of carbon with long-rotation periods of forest. There are uncertainties on the estimation on carbon flux due to the application of various models of estimates, because the capacity of carbon stock is determined by several technical and financial variables. The main tool for the CO2 emissions’ mitigation is carbon offset that may represent a cost-effective solution. Here we show that there is not yet a precise correlation between forest projects and Kyoto Protocol goal. The study furthermore focuses on the credits of forestry projects, that could be sold or purchased on the carbon market. Eventually, we also consider the ethical and political problems connected with the use biomass ITPs (Industrial Tree Plantations). In conclusion, the work shed light underlines the complex side of decision processes in framing and selecting models to estimate the carbon balance under Kyoto Protocol target. The opportunity of investment in forest projects depends on the cost management of the projects themselves, and the price between wood market and unit carbon.

The complex issues of carbon sink: a critical overview / Ciasullo, Raffaele; Simone, Cristina; Conti, Marcelo Enrique. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH. - ISSN 1743-4955. - STAMPA. - 7:(2014), pp. 171-195. [10.1504/IJENVH.2014.067379]

The complex issues of carbon sink: a critical overview

CIASULLO, RAFFAELE;SIMONE, CRISTINA;CONTI, Marcelo Enrique
2014

Abstract

The aim of the paper is to offer a systemic overview about some critical and interdependent relations among carbon offset, carbon sequestration and carbon stock. Rooting in the complexity perspective, the work discusses some relevant measurement methods and financial issues related to the Land Use - Land Use Change Forestry (LULUCF) applied under Kyoto Protocol rules. The carbon sinks could contribute to the sequestration of carbon with long-rotation periods of forest. There are uncertainties on the estimation on carbon flux due to the application of various models of estimates, because the capacity of carbon stock is determined by several technical and financial variables. The main tool for the CO2 emissions’ mitigation is carbon offset that may represent a cost-effective solution. Here we show that there is not yet a precise correlation between forest projects and Kyoto Protocol goal. The study furthermore focuses on the credits of forestry projects, that could be sold or purchased on the carbon market. Eventually, we also consider the ethical and political problems connected with the use biomass ITPs (Industrial Tree Plantations). In conclusion, the work shed light underlines the complex side of decision processes in framing and selecting models to estimate the carbon balance under Kyoto Protocol target. The opportunity of investment in forest projects depends on the cost management of the projects themselves, and the price between wood market and unit carbon.
2014
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The complex issues of carbon sink: a critical overview / Ciasullo, Raffaele; Simone, Cristina; Conti, Marcelo Enrique. - In: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH. - ISSN 1743-4955. - STAMPA. - 7:(2014), pp. 171-195. [10.1504/IJENVH.2014.067379]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/615690
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact