OBJECTIVES: To assess whether morphology and dimension of the upper airway differ between patients characterized by various craniofacial morphology. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Ninety young adult patients from the Postgraduate Clinic, Section of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark, with no obvious signs of respiratory diseases and no previous adeno-tonsillectomy procedures. Thirty patients were characterized as Class I (-0.5 < ANB < 4.5), 30 as Class II (ANB > 4.5), and 30 as Class III (ANB < -0.5). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained in a supine position for all patients. Cephalometric landmarks were identified in 3D. Sagittal and transversal dimensions, cross sections, and partial and total volumes of the upper airway were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in all three planes of space. The cross-sectional minimal area of the upper airway was assessed as well. RESULTS: No statistical significant relationships between dimension and morphology of upper airways and skeletal malocclusion were found. CONCLUSION: Differences in craniofacial morphology as identified by the sagittal jaw relationship were not correlated with variation in upper airway volumes. A clinical significant relation was detected between minimal area and total upper airway volume.

The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study / DI CARLO, Gabriele; Polimeni, Antonella; Melsen, B; Cattaneo, Pm. - In: ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1601-6335. - STAMPA. - 18:1(2015), pp. 1-11. [10.1111/ocr.12053]

The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study

DI CARLO, GABRIELE
Primo
;
POLIMENI, Antonella
Secondo
;
2015

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether morphology and dimension of the upper airway differ between patients characterized by various craniofacial morphology. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Ninety young adult patients from the Postgraduate Clinic, Section of Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Health, Aarhus University, Denmark, with no obvious signs of respiratory diseases and no previous adeno-tonsillectomy procedures. Thirty patients were characterized as Class I (-0.5 < ANB < 4.5), 30 as Class II (ANB > 4.5), and 30 as Class III (ANB < -0.5). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans obtained in a supine position for all patients. Cephalometric landmarks were identified in 3D. Sagittal and transversal dimensions, cross sections, and partial and total volumes of the upper airway were correlated with the cephalometric measurements in all three planes of space. The cross-sectional minimal area of the upper airway was assessed as well. RESULTS: No statistical significant relationships between dimension and morphology of upper airways and skeletal malocclusion were found. CONCLUSION: Differences in craniofacial morphology as identified by the sagittal jaw relationship were not correlated with variation in upper airway volumes. A clinical significant relation was detected between minimal area and total upper airway volume.
2015
cone-beam computed tomography; orthodontics; pharynx; upper airway
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
The relationship between upper airways and craniofacial morphology studied in 3D. A CBCT study / DI CARLO, Gabriele; Polimeni, Antonella; Melsen, B; Cattaneo, Pm. - In: ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH. - ISSN 1601-6335. - STAMPA. - 18:1(2015), pp. 1-11. [10.1111/ocr.12053]
File allegati a questo prodotto
File Dimensione Formato  
Di-Carlo_Relationship_2015.pdf

solo gestori archivio

Tipologia: Versione editoriale (versione pubblicata con il layout dell'editore)
Licenza: Tutti i diritti riservati (All rights reserved)
Dimensione 497.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
497.87 kB Adobe PDF   Contatta l'autore

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/611980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 18
  • Scopus 76
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 66
social impact