Recent studies in nonmonotonic reasoning have shown that many of the best known nonmonotonic logics are based on the same two fundamental principles, i.e. minimal knowledge and negation as failure (or negation by default). In this paper we prove that it is possible to express negation as failure in terms of minimal knowledge. Specifically, we present a polynomial, non-faithful, modular embedding of Lifschitz's logic of minimal knowledge and negation as failure MKNF into Halpern and Moses' logic of minimal knowledge S5(G). From the theoretical viewpoint, this result implies that minimal knowledge has the same expressive power of negation as failure, hence it is possible to embed all the best known propositional nonmonotonic formalisms, in particular default logic, autoepistemic logic, and circumscription, into S5(G). From the perspective of knowledge-based systems, the proposed embedding allows in principle for realizing negation as failure in systems without a negation as failure construct, as e.g. positive disjunctive deductive databases.

Embedding negation as failure into minimal knowledge / Rosati, Riccardo. - (1998), pp. 28-32. (Intervento presentato al convegno 13th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 98) tenutosi a BRIGHTON, ENGLAND nel AUG 23-28, 1998).

Embedding negation as failure into minimal knowledge

ROSATI, Riccardo
1998

Abstract

Recent studies in nonmonotonic reasoning have shown that many of the best known nonmonotonic logics are based on the same two fundamental principles, i.e. minimal knowledge and negation as failure (or negation by default). In this paper we prove that it is possible to express negation as failure in terms of minimal knowledge. Specifically, we present a polynomial, non-faithful, modular embedding of Lifschitz's logic of minimal knowledge and negation as failure MKNF into Halpern and Moses' logic of minimal knowledge S5(G). From the theoretical viewpoint, this result implies that minimal knowledge has the same expressive power of negation as failure, hence it is possible to embed all the best known propositional nonmonotonic formalisms, in particular default logic, autoepistemic logic, and circumscription, into S5(G). From the perspective of knowledge-based systems, the proposed embedding allows in principle for realizing negation as failure in systems without a negation as failure construct, as e.g. positive disjunctive deductive databases.
1998
9780471984313
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/51990
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact