In metastatic colorectal cancer, an intensive first-line regimen may impair second-line treatments. We evaluated the outcome of second-line therapies among the 196 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in three trials. Activity and efficacy were in line with previous studies and retreatment with triplet achieved promising results. FOLFOXIRI does not impair second-line treatments and in selected patients rechallenge may represent a valid option. Purpose: FOLFOXIRI demonstrated higher efficacy compared to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the outcome of second-line treatments among 196 patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI in three consecutive trials conducted by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest group. Patients and Methods: One hundred seventy-two of 196 patients so far progressed and 136 (79%) received second-line therapies: 32 (24%) were rechallenged with FOLFOXIRI, 52 (38%) were treated with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based doublets, and 52 (38%) received fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C or single-agent chemotherapy. Only 10 patients received bevacizumab (3) or cetuximab (7) with chemotherapy. Activity and efficacy data were collected and subgroup analyses were performed according to the regimen administered. Results: Overall response rate (RR) was 23%; median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. At an exploratory subgroup analysis, retreatment with FOLFOXIRI was associated with longer PFS (8.2 versus 6.3 months; P = .003, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61) and OS (19.3 versus 14.0 months; P = .02, HR = 0.57) compared with doublets; single-agent chemotherapy or fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C was significantly lower in terms of RR (8%), PFS (3.0 months), and OS (8.7 months) compared with FOLFOXIRI or doublets. Conclusions: First-line FOLFOXIRI does not impair the efficacy of second-line treatments. In some patients rechallenge with FOLFOXIRI may represent a valid option, although potential imbalances in prognostic factors due to better patient selection should be considered.

Outcome of Second-Line Treatment After First-Line Chemotherapy With the GONO FOLFOXIRI Regimen / Lorenzo, Fornaro; Enrico, Vasile; Gianluca, Masi; Fotios, Loupakis; Giacomo Giulio, Baldi; Giacomo, Allegrini; Lisa, Salvatore; Chiara, Cremolini; Samanta, Cupini; Cortesi, Enrico; Tuzi, Alessandro; Cristina, Granetto; Isa Maura, Brunetti; Sergio, Ricci; Alfredo, Falcone. - In: CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER. - ISSN 1533-0028. - 11:1(2012), pp. 71-76. [10.1016/j.clcc.2011.06.013]

Outcome of Second-Line Treatment After First-Line Chemotherapy With the GONO FOLFOXIRI Regimen

CORTESI, Enrico;TUZI, ALESSANDRO;
2012

Abstract

In metastatic colorectal cancer, an intensive first-line regimen may impair second-line treatments. We evaluated the outcome of second-line therapies among the 196 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in three trials. Activity and efficacy were in line with previous studies and retreatment with triplet achieved promising results. FOLFOXIRI does not impair second-line treatments and in selected patients rechallenge may represent a valid option. Purpose: FOLFOXIRI demonstrated higher efficacy compared to 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. We evaluated the outcome of second-line treatments among 196 patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI in three consecutive trials conducted by the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest group. Patients and Methods: One hundred seventy-two of 196 patients so far progressed and 136 (79%) received second-line therapies: 32 (24%) were rechallenged with FOLFOXIRI, 52 (38%) were treated with irinotecan- or oxaliplatin-based doublets, and 52 (38%) received fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C or single-agent chemotherapy. Only 10 patients received bevacizumab (3) or cetuximab (7) with chemotherapy. Activity and efficacy data were collected and subgroup analyses were performed according to the regimen administered. Results: Overall response rate (RR) was 23%; median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. At an exploratory subgroup analysis, retreatment with FOLFOXIRI was associated with longer PFS (8.2 versus 6.3 months; P = .003, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61) and OS (19.3 versus 14.0 months; P = .02, HR = 0.57) compared with doublets; single-agent chemotherapy or fluoropyrimidine plus mytomicin C was significantly lower in terms of RR (8%), PFS (3.0 months), and OS (8.7 months) compared with FOLFOXIRI or doublets. Conclusions: First-line FOLFOXIRI does not impair the efficacy of second-line treatments. In some patients rechallenge with FOLFOXIRI may represent a valid option, although potential imbalances in prognostic factors due to better patient selection should be considered.
2012
triplet regimen; irinotecan; oxaliplatin; 5-fluorouracil; chemotherapy
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Outcome of Second-Line Treatment After First-Line Chemotherapy With the GONO FOLFOXIRI Regimen / Lorenzo, Fornaro; Enrico, Vasile; Gianluca, Masi; Fotios, Loupakis; Giacomo Giulio, Baldi; Giacomo, Allegrini; Lisa, Salvatore; Chiara, Cremolini; Samanta, Cupini; Cortesi, Enrico; Tuzi, Alessandro; Cristina, Granetto; Isa Maura, Brunetti; Sergio, Ricci; Alfredo, Falcone. - In: CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER. - ISSN 1533-0028. - 11:1(2012), pp. 71-76. [10.1016/j.clcc.2011.06.013]
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/407936
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact