Forty patients with serious lidocaine-responsive ventricular arrhythmias were randomly assigned to treatment with either oral disopyramide (100 mg 4 times daily) or mexiletine (200 mg 4 times daily) for 3 weeks. A satisfactory arrhythmias control (greater than 75 % reduction of premature ventricular complexes per minute as compared to the control period prior to lidocaine administration) was achieved in 19 patients in the mexiletine group and in 16 in the disopyramide treated patients. Furthermore, disopyramide failed to maintain the reduction of the number of ventricular extrasystoles per minute obtained with lidocaine, while mexiletine succeeded. Finally, the number of ventricular extrasystoles per minute in the mexiletine treated group was significantly lower than in the other group. Gastrointestinal disturbances were more frequent during mexiletine administration.

Disopyramide and mexiletine: which is the agent of choice in the long term-oral treatment of lidocaine-responsive arrhythmias? Efficacy comparison in a randomized trial / B., Trimarco; Volpe, Massimo; B., Ricciardelli; L., Sacca'; N., De Luca; F., Rengo; M., Condorelli. - In: ARCHIVES INTERNATIONALES DE PHARMACODYNAMIE ET DE THERAPIE. - ISSN 0003-9780. - 248:2(1980).

Disopyramide and mexiletine: which is the agent of choice in the long term-oral treatment of lidocaine-responsive arrhythmias? Efficacy comparison in a randomized trial.

VOLPE, Massimo;
1980

Abstract

Forty patients with serious lidocaine-responsive ventricular arrhythmias were randomly assigned to treatment with either oral disopyramide (100 mg 4 times daily) or mexiletine (200 mg 4 times daily) for 3 weeks. A satisfactory arrhythmias control (greater than 75 % reduction of premature ventricular complexes per minute as compared to the control period prior to lidocaine administration) was achieved in 19 patients in the mexiletine group and in 16 in the disopyramide treated patients. Furthermore, disopyramide failed to maintain the reduction of the number of ventricular extrasystoles per minute obtained with lidocaine, while mexiletine succeeded. Finally, the number of ventricular extrasystoles per minute in the mexiletine treated group was significantly lower than in the other group. Gastrointestinal disturbances were more frequent during mexiletine administration.
1980
01 Pubblicazione su rivista::01a Articolo in rivista
Disopyramide and mexiletine: which is the agent of choice in the long term-oral treatment of lidocaine-responsive arrhythmias? Efficacy comparison in a randomized trial / B., Trimarco; Volpe, Massimo; B., Ricciardelli; L., Sacca'; N., De Luca; F., Rengo; M., Condorelli. - In: ARCHIVES INTERNATIONALES DE PHARMACODYNAMIE ET DE THERAPIE. - ISSN 0003-9780. - 248:2(1980).
File allegati a questo prodotto
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11573/382257
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 7
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact